W
watercolors
More thoughts
Couple more thoughts about the 3 keel stories and the Catalina keel.The MacGreger, the keel was modified so that story doesn't count but, think about the other two stories. In both stories the weight of the keel wanted the keel to keep moving even though the boat was stopped. The Merit, the bow was stronger than the keel trunk and the keel has no extra support. The Balboa, the keel swings on a cable just like the Catalina, but swings up inside the hull. I failed to tell that the damage was done to the front of the keel trunk and not the back. No one knows how tight the keel cable was!Catalina keel thoughts,Keel swings on a rod attached to the boat with 4 bolts.90 percent of the keel size and weight is to the one side of this rod.What keeps the Catalina keel from swinging like a pendulum.The Catalina keel does not hang completely vertical when down.What holds this keel at about a 20 to 30 degree angle when the cable goes slack . . . ?The Balboa damage was cause by the keel riding up over the top of the stump and when it cleared the other side came slamming down like a gigantic lever. The top part of the keel, just like a CatalinaÕs, crushed the keelÕs forward stopping mechanism. The keel stop is just a keel trunk part that allows the top of the keel to rest against, thus holding the keel to its suggested design angle. A 900 to 1000 lb. 6 foot lever against a small 2 x 12 inch fiberglass keel trunk on the Balboa! On the Catalina, I believe, is the side of the front settee seat, Ô86 and newer, the raised side that the cushion doesnÕt cover. Upon repair of this keel stop, small pieces of regular sponges were found in the fiberglass. Mr. Hess designed this area for an impact.So, if the cable would of been tighter, not allowing the keel bottom to move forward like the Merit, would there of been less damage? If the cable is tight, not allowing the keel to swing further forward and the keel is dropped like the Balboa, would the cable stop it? Would the cable snap?Hum!
Couple more thoughts about the 3 keel stories and the Catalina keel.The MacGreger, the keel was modified so that story doesn't count but, think about the other two stories. In both stories the weight of the keel wanted the keel to keep moving even though the boat was stopped. The Merit, the bow was stronger than the keel trunk and the keel has no extra support. The Balboa, the keel swings on a cable just like the Catalina, but swings up inside the hull. I failed to tell that the damage was done to the front of the keel trunk and not the back. No one knows how tight the keel cable was!Catalina keel thoughts,Keel swings on a rod attached to the boat with 4 bolts.90 percent of the keel size and weight is to the one side of this rod.What keeps the Catalina keel from swinging like a pendulum.The Catalina keel does not hang completely vertical when down.What holds this keel at about a 20 to 30 degree angle when the cable goes slack . . . ?The Balboa damage was cause by the keel riding up over the top of the stump and when it cleared the other side came slamming down like a gigantic lever. The top part of the keel, just like a CatalinaÕs, crushed the keelÕs forward stopping mechanism. The keel stop is just a keel trunk part that allows the top of the keel to rest against, thus holding the keel to its suggested design angle. A 900 to 1000 lb. 6 foot lever against a small 2 x 12 inch fiberglass keel trunk on the Balboa! On the Catalina, I believe, is the side of the front settee seat, Ô86 and newer, the raised side that the cushion doesnÕt cover. Upon repair of this keel stop, small pieces of regular sponges were found in the fiberglass. Mr. Hess designed this area for an impact.So, if the cable would of been tighter, not allowing the keel bottom to move forward like the Merit, would there of been less damage? If the cable is tight, not allowing the keel to swing further forward and the keel is dropped like the Balboa, would the cable stop it? Would the cable snap?Hum!