Keel 260 (called a 270 now) vs. 260 water ballast.
Sorry Mike, have to disagree a little here. I generally reefed at 3-5 knots earlier in my 26 vs. a keeled 260. Some of that difference could be attributed to my older sails but not all. A ton of water wieghs as much as a ton of lead but, you can put the ton of lead much lower and on the centerline vs. water. I think the 26/260 is a blast, but somewhat less stable (heels quicker)then a keeled boat. Proper reefing is the key to keeping the kids and Mrs. happy (I like to put the rail in the water myself). When going to windward where reefing is needed, performance suffers because of the relatively large amount of windage from the high cabin which then competes with the reduced sail area for moving the boat. There is no free ride so the large cockpit, cabin and high freeboard that we all like carries the price of windage. Think about where you will sail, usual wind conditions, depth of the water, and so on. The 26 was best for me because of relatively low cost, large cabin and cockpit, and swing keel. I can let my six year olds walk to the beach from an anchorage. I don't trailer but, the water balast allows a lighter swing keel to be used. Heavy iorn swing keels carry their own set of problems that I didn't want. In my opinion, the boat lives to sail between 10 to 15 knots of wind. Personally have singlehanded in 28 to 30 knots with higher gusts. It was exciting. alan