well... this is not a fair assessment at all!
it could be, that for every perspective buyer looking at the boat, if the owner had to pay to haul the boat to show it, then it could get VERY expensive for him, especially when there is no guarantee the perspective buyer will buy it even if the hull is perfect....
its up to the buyer to look at the hull if he wants to... or not, if he doesnt. the buyer has to have to have it hauled to do a proper survey anyway...
but what can happen is this... the buyer should already know the condition of the bottom(as well as the actual condition of the rest of the boat), so after disclosing what he knows to be fact to the buyer, and if it sounds reasonably acceptable to the buyer, an agreement can be made between the seller and the buyer.
The agreement could be such that if the bottom is NOT up to par with what the seller disclosed, THEN the seller assumes the cost of hauling the boat. and the perspective buyer pays nothing, other than a show up fee for the surveyor.... and everyone goes home:cry:
but if all is acceptable, the survey commences and the buyer pays the bill...
its not fool proof but it would help weed out the lookers who may insist on seeing the bottom, but are not as interested in the boat as they should be when somebody else is paying the hoist fees involved, and it could greatly reduce the perspective buyers cost when looking at several boats. its the only fair way to do it
no matter how you look at it, its an expensive thing to deal in boats, no matter if your buying or selling.
those that say they actually make money buying and selling used boats are VERY, VERY rare... or they are ignorant to the actual costs they have incurred, OR they are just plain old Liars!
...