Two comments
IMHO determining your vessel's polars (after you have finished making all changes to hull, appendages, rig and above-deck windage items and have put all necessary on-board gear and tankage in it's usual place) is worthwhile and there are books and articles that describe how you can experimentally determine these for your own vessel. This is very time-consuming but pretty much the only way if you are not sailing a tricked-out one-design with only minimal variation from boat to boat. Even then, though, you need to realize that cruisers, offshore sailors, etc are far more concerned about seastate, current (e.g. Gulf Stream) and weather forecast than about current wind speed and direction when planning their route. Not because current wind parameters are not important but simply because these other factors are far more difficult to include in the overall decision making process. Essentially, polars are just a bare bones starting point, since they are completely oblivious to these other factors; i.e. they will show you the fastest route provided you have a flatsea, no current (let alone eddies, etc.) and a stable forecast. The second comment is that letting any instrument take control of your autopilot in such a way that you cannot precisely predict the actual course over the ground which will be followed can only be a good idea if there are no significant obstacles near the anticipated route. Although this also applies to windvanes (or autopilots under wind control) since the wind may clock back and forth, thereby drastically changing your intended course most windvanes are being used on cruising vessels that adhere to around-the-clock watch schedules. The dangers of letting electronic instruments take over the helm without continuous supervision or fully understanding the maximum possible course changes cannot be overstated, as the annecdotal reports of superyachts running straight onto a crowded beach (usually near a large marina entrance) may perhaps confirm.Flying Dutchman