As an idle sailors waiting for winter to pass I was trying to figure out my reef-points on my roller furling mainsail and furling jib to keep the sail plan in balance.
Right now with full main and full jib she sails great in light winds with just a slight pull to windward which for me is perfect. My jib is a 110% with a published data of 295 sq.ft. and mainsail of 384 sq.ft.
The ratios are I = 44' 10" J = 13' 2" P = 44' 11" E = 16' although when I calculate these ratios it doesn't quite match up with the publish sail areas as shown in the attached photo (it has in-mast furling with no extended roach as the standard main does, but the foot is extended from15' to 16')
Anyway that aside I wanted to be able to mark the foot on each sail so I would remain in balance at reef points of 20%, 40%, & 60% however there is not a direct reduction in sail area to foot length. With the main for instants when you reduce the foot (E) by 20% you are also reducing the height. (P) by 20% as it furls. And you do not end up reducing the sail area by 20% from 384 to 307 instead you end up with an area of 230 sq.ft.
Given the formula for a triangle area is "1/2 base X height" and using some hit or miss calculations it seems that to put in a reef of 20% the foot length should be reduced by 11%, 40% = 23% and 60% = 36% in my case the main foot length equivalent would be 14.25ft, 12.3 ft & 10.25ft.
Would the jib % ratio remain the same? Is there a simple formula to work this out? Will the spring come before I go crazy with trivial minutiae.
Right now with full main and full jib she sails great in light winds with just a slight pull to windward which for me is perfect. My jib is a 110% with a published data of 295 sq.ft. and mainsail of 384 sq.ft.
The ratios are I = 44' 10" J = 13' 2" P = 44' 11" E = 16' although when I calculate these ratios it doesn't quite match up with the publish sail areas as shown in the attached photo (it has in-mast furling with no extended roach as the standard main does, but the foot is extended from15' to 16')
Anyway that aside I wanted to be able to mark the foot on each sail so I would remain in balance at reef points of 20%, 40%, & 60% however there is not a direct reduction in sail area to foot length. With the main for instants when you reduce the foot (E) by 20% you are also reducing the height. (P) by 20% as it furls. And you do not end up reducing the sail area by 20% from 384 to 307 instead you end up with an area of 230 sq.ft.
Given the formula for a triangle area is "1/2 base X height" and using some hit or miss calculations it seems that to put in a reef of 20% the foot length should be reduced by 11%, 40% = 23% and 60% = 36% in my case the main foot length equivalent would be 14.25ft, 12.3 ft & 10.25ft.
Would the jib % ratio remain the same? Is there a simple formula to work this out? Will the spring come before I go crazy with trivial minutiae.
Attachments
-
45.2 KB Views: 257