So, what are the arguments against recoating the whole hull in gelcoat? Is it more expensive than paint? I imagine to do the whole hull you would have to mix the catalyst in batches. I imagine you could do sections at a time as long as you're drawing from a large supply of gelcoat all mixed together to guarantee an even color.
The real problem is that generally marinas are not going to let you DIY spray gelcoat, especially for large areas because of the 'drift' of 'overspray' ... and all the EPA, etc. regulations and liability issues because the components are 'chemicals'.
Gelcoating an entire hull is quite expensive, and can be quite laborious ... but is better lasting and not as 'fragile' as 'paint' and most importantly does not 'lift' when the surface is subject to long term water immersion which is the downside of ALL topside 'paints'. With very close 'color matching' only the 'problem areas' need to be restored not the entire hull, no so with 'paint'. OEM gelcoat is usually quite thick and can usually be quite deeply sanded down to 'good' gelcoat. Even if you mistakenly sand into the matting layer, the gel is still easier to apply than 'painting an entire topsides'. Once you paint topsides, etc. you will be continuously painting the topsides, etc. forever more.
The downside of gelcoating is that it has a HIGH learning curve ... good gelcoating as well as spray painting is a finely developed 'art' but can be learned if you are 'fastidious' and not timid.