2nd on Sobstad
I sail a Catalina 25, fin keel, tall rig, and have used a set of Sobstad Genesis for 5 Yrs. Full batten, loose footed main, and 150 jib. They were flatter than my old sails, but had more surface area, so a wider wind strength range. The best part was working with a good racing sailmaker. With the main I asked for 2nd set of reef points and was told I didn't need them due to low stretch in the material that wouldn't bag out in heavier winds and cause excessive heeling. He was right! With the full battens, I can luff the main slightly in the gusts without feeling like I'm damaging the sail. Loose foot gives very flexible control of lower shape which is important since you don't stretch this material for shape like Dacron. For slight extra downwind sail area, loose foot can hang below boom. Also was cut with larger roach, and longer leach for same reason, but the latter gave some boom droop. The jib is working well also. Since the boat was measured by the sailmaker, the jib is a true decksweeper, and the clew comes within one half inch of the block at full tension. Whew! The sails still have good shape, but I've had some small holes due to hanging up on hardware, but these have been repaired by myself with a clear sticky back material I got from the loft. I have a Dacron North 135% of the same vintage, which is a good sail also, but it is much heavier to hold good shape. I think many of my comments could apply to other sails or brands, but I am now a fan of non-Dacron if they have good shape. But I really think the choice of sailmaker is more important than the actual sail. The choice of 135% or 150% depends entirely on the predominate wind strength in your area.