relative heel
The sideslip and heel of a 22 is all relative, of course. But after all the talk about the "tenderness" of the O22, and it's supposed sideslipping "problems", I was amazed at how well this boat sailed when I finally got mine in the water. I've kept the main and jib up in stuff I would have ran for home in with my last, centerboard, boat.First of all, sometime in the late 70's or early 80's, O'day added a centerboard. But they then decreased the depth of the keel! Now why would they decrease the depth of a keel on a boat with the already acceptable draft of only 1' 11" I don't know, but I'm glad I have the early version. They should have just added the centerboard, if they felt the urge, without taking away that ballast from so low down, where it is most helpful.Are you racing somebody? If not, let me say this: This summer, I could point well enough to get anywhere I wanted to go in a reasonable amount of time. I could tack under main alone, in a blow. I never felt sideslip a problem of anykind. I compared my track to just about every other cruising boat on Haverstraw bay (quite a selection), and never felt at a loss.As for heel, in whitecaps and nasty chop, my 235 pound friend could stay on the leeward side, and the boat would not be near burying the rail. All summer, nothing rolled, jumped, fell off the galley shelf. My wife and child have played pick-up sticks on the table while I sailed. So what's all the problem? I think some are comparing the O22 to a Colin Archer Redingskote, or some other, non-trailerable powerhouse... I, personally, have found no disadvantage to this wonderful shoal design. I am quite pleased. Rich.