I wouldn't think that flooded lead acid batteries would be so difficult to understand, but maybe they are really rocket science.
I currently have four golf cart batteries made by US Battery that were new in June 2006. Just used two seasons. I have a Link 20 that I obsess over to be sure my batteries are in better health that I me. I measure and record the specific gravity of all the cells several times per season and check the electrolyte level about once per month. I also have a Trojan starting battery that is six years old.
My sailboat lives on a mooring. It is almost never plugged into shore power. All recharging is done with a 70A charger and a 30A charger together driven by a genset. When motoring I have a 80A Balmar with an external regulator to replenish as much charge as possible. I also have a wind generator that pumps 5-10A if I have wind, but I usually see under 3A.
My problem is that it seems like my batteries are always undercharged. I put in the wind generator so that it would top off my batteries between uses of the boat. If the darn wind would just blow that might actually work.
Today I measured the specific gravity of all five batteries- four golf carts and one starting. Tomorrow I will install them all onboard. They have been kept in my basement, first fully charged and then on a float charge all winter.
I took the batteries off float 36 hours ago. Here are my measurements:
Six year old starting battery:
Voltage=12.91v
Specific gravity (corrected) 1.277, 1.282,1.277, 1.282,1.277, 1.277
The four two-year old golf carts:
#1-A, V=6.36, sg (corrected)= 1.257 (all three cells)
#1-B, V=6.36, sg (corrected)= 1.257 (all three cells)
#2-A, V=6.37, sg (corrected)= 1.257, 1.262, 1.262
#2-B, V=6.36, sg (corrected)= 1.257 (all three cells)
The combined voltage of these pairs is 12.72V, and I consider a corrected specific gravity of 1.260 to be 100% charged.
The golf carts were connected in pairs and paralleled together and also with the starting battery for charging and then float charging all winter.
What I see here is very typical of deep cycle and starting type batteries that I have observed over the years. The deep cycle batteries never reach the higher sg readings or the higher terminal voltage of a starting type battery.
When I have shown this discrepency to other electrical engineers, they have told me that my deep cycle batteries are simply not fully charged and that all flooded lead acid cells should charge to the same terminal voltage and the same specific gravity if they are good cells and are fully charged.
I have researched this topic and found no information that suggests that a deep cycle and a starting battery should have different endpoint readings. Yet I have always seen this difference.
Am I nuts?
I won't ask my wife becasuse her answer has nothing to do with the charged state of my batteries. So the question goes to the techno-geeks here.
Are these sg readings normal? Are my deep cycle batteries undercharged? If the sg readings of the deep cycle are normal, why is the sg of the starting battery so much higher?
I'll be away for Sat and Sunday to uncover, wash, prep, and bottom paint. I'll check for your opinions on Sunday evening.
I currently have four golf cart batteries made by US Battery that were new in June 2006. Just used two seasons. I have a Link 20 that I obsess over to be sure my batteries are in better health that I me. I measure and record the specific gravity of all the cells several times per season and check the electrolyte level about once per month. I also have a Trojan starting battery that is six years old.
My sailboat lives on a mooring. It is almost never plugged into shore power. All recharging is done with a 70A charger and a 30A charger together driven by a genset. When motoring I have a 80A Balmar with an external regulator to replenish as much charge as possible. I also have a wind generator that pumps 5-10A if I have wind, but I usually see under 3A.
My problem is that it seems like my batteries are always undercharged. I put in the wind generator so that it would top off my batteries between uses of the boat. If the darn wind would just blow that might actually work.
Today I measured the specific gravity of all five batteries- four golf carts and one starting. Tomorrow I will install them all onboard. They have been kept in my basement, first fully charged and then on a float charge all winter.
I took the batteries off float 36 hours ago. Here are my measurements:
Six year old starting battery:
Voltage=12.91v
Specific gravity (corrected) 1.277, 1.282,1.277, 1.282,1.277, 1.277
The four two-year old golf carts:
#1-A, V=6.36, sg (corrected)= 1.257 (all three cells)
#1-B, V=6.36, sg (corrected)= 1.257 (all three cells)
#2-A, V=6.37, sg (corrected)= 1.257, 1.262, 1.262
#2-B, V=6.36, sg (corrected)= 1.257 (all three cells)
The combined voltage of these pairs is 12.72V, and I consider a corrected specific gravity of 1.260 to be 100% charged.
The golf carts were connected in pairs and paralleled together and also with the starting battery for charging and then float charging all winter.
What I see here is very typical of deep cycle and starting type batteries that I have observed over the years. The deep cycle batteries never reach the higher sg readings or the higher terminal voltage of a starting type battery.
When I have shown this discrepency to other electrical engineers, they have told me that my deep cycle batteries are simply not fully charged and that all flooded lead acid cells should charge to the same terminal voltage and the same specific gravity if they are good cells and are fully charged.
I have researched this topic and found no information that suggests that a deep cycle and a starting battery should have different endpoint readings. Yet I have always seen this difference.
Am I nuts?
Are these sg readings normal? Are my deep cycle batteries undercharged? If the sg readings of the deep cycle are normal, why is the sg of the starting battery so much higher?
I'll be away for Sat and Sunday to uncover, wash, prep, and bottom paint. I'll check for your opinions on Sunday evening.