new to postings, here's my 2 cents. Good Old Boat issue Aug.'09had a Mailbouy note that a product called Coppercoat was in the US. Out since '91 with a good track record, non ablative(does not slough off), can be burnished, good for trailerables, copper(99.9 pure) embedded in epoxy overcoat. The cons are that it is not initially cheap, and does turn green when in seawater. Good for 10+ years, you'll get your break ever in 2-3 years. www.coppercoatusa.com
Non-toxic Bottom Paints
- Thread starter dscribner
- Start date
- Status
Now that you mention it, the British mag Practical Boat Owner did a long-term test of a "pure" copper bottom-paint (10+ years, in-water for at least 6 months a year), buffing & touch-ups when necessary, and they were very happy with the results.
I still wonder whether such a pricey solution would be as cost-effective for the trailer sailor.
What about WEST epoxy with their copper powder mixed in? Maybe even mix in some of their graphite powder for a slick, anti-fowling coating? Maybe I need to experiment on my rudder?
Don
Don
This is interesting as well
Paint companies, boatyards, and boat owners will no doubt be closely watching the progress of an antifouling report posted today by the San Diego Unified Port District and funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.
San Diego port officials forwarded the “Final Report on Safer Alternatives to Copper Alternatives to Antifouling Paints for Marine Vessels” to the EPA on Feb. 4. Presenting data on a wide range of alternative antifouling paints that contain limited or no harmful biocides, the 152-page report is based on both controlled panel tests and field tests on several different powerboats and sailboats that berth in the port district. The report highlights several findings regarding the cost and effectiveness of paints that contain no harmful biocides. It also includes a guidelines on how to choose a paint that is both effective and minimizes impact on the environment.
One of the key aspects of the study that will interest Practical Sailor readers is economic study of the annualized cost of using a paint that has no biocides. According to the study, once the application and cleaning costs are amortized over the life of the paint, the costs of using a hard, slick non-biocide paint are comparable to the annual expenses for using a copper-based paints.
However, the most optimistic cost estimates for non-biocide paints rely on a 5-10 year projected life span for hard, slick non-biocide paints. Since the San Diego in-the-water hull tests lasted less than 2 years, the longer projections were based on manufacturer-supplied data from large commercial ships, the primary users of these types of paints. Nevertheless, the study’s authors suggest that such lifespan projections are not unreasonable.
The report concludes that the successful transition to a non-biocide paint will require close cooperation of port officials, boat owners, paint manufacturers, boatyards, and hull cleaners. Another key point was that to prolong the life of a paint—including those that have biocides such as copper or zinc—professional hull-cleaners must start with the least aggressive cleaning tool possible, such as terry cloth. The Port of San Diego is currently gathering input on a draft rule requiring that hull cleaners obtain permits in order to work in the district waters.
In the preliminary panel test, several mainstream paints that used a zinc biocide were effective, but because the goal of the test was to find alternatives to biocides, very few zinc paints went on to the second round.
Paint companies, boatyards, and boat owners will no doubt be closely watching the progress of an antifouling report posted today by the San Diego Unified Port District and funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.
San Diego port officials forwarded the “Final Report on Safer Alternatives to Copper Alternatives to Antifouling Paints for Marine Vessels” to the EPA on Feb. 4. Presenting data on a wide range of alternative antifouling paints that contain limited or no harmful biocides, the 152-page report is based on both controlled panel tests and field tests on several different powerboats and sailboats that berth in the port district. The report highlights several findings regarding the cost and effectiveness of paints that contain no harmful biocides. It also includes a guidelines on how to choose a paint that is both effective and minimizes impact on the environment.
One of the key aspects of the study that will interest Practical Sailor readers is economic study of the annualized cost of using a paint that has no biocides. According to the study, once the application and cleaning costs are amortized over the life of the paint, the costs of using a hard, slick non-biocide paint are comparable to the annual expenses for using a copper-based paints.
However, the most optimistic cost estimates for non-biocide paints rely on a 5-10 year projected life span for hard, slick non-biocide paints. Since the San Diego in-the-water hull tests lasted less than 2 years, the longer projections were based on manufacturer-supplied data from large commercial ships, the primary users of these types of paints. Nevertheless, the study’s authors suggest that such lifespan projections are not unreasonable.
The report concludes that the successful transition to a non-biocide paint will require close cooperation of port officials, boat owners, paint manufacturers, boatyards, and hull cleaners. Another key point was that to prolong the life of a paint—including those that have biocides such as copper or zinc—professional hull-cleaners must start with the least aggressive cleaning tool possible, such as terry cloth. The Port of San Diego is currently gathering input on a draft rule requiring that hull cleaners obtain permits in order to work in the district waters.
In the preliminary panel test, several mainstream paints that used a zinc biocide were effective, but because the goal of the test was to find alternatives to biocides, very few zinc paints went on to the second round.
Claude, mon frere, merci!
I just down loaded the septilogy from the website. I'll get into that light reading tonight. And thanks for taking all the time to type that narrative. My goodness! I would have worn my backspace key clean through!
Don
I just down loaded the septilogy from the website. I'll get into that light reading tonight. And thanks for taking all the time to type that narrative. My goodness! I would have worn my backspace key clean through!
Don
- Status