I have a 20 x 14 three blade flexofold on my H466. I think you and I have the same 76 hp Yanmar. I cruise at 7.8 kts at 2750 rpm. At 3600 rpm I hit 8.6 but the fuel curve says 3.6 gph. At 2750 rpm the fuel consumption is 1.6-1.8 gph measured. A buddy with another H460 had a max prop but after having it rebuilt twice he switched to the flexofold. He also preferred the flexofold over his previous Max-Prop. That Max-Prop he sold to a H44 owner who loves it and has nearly 15000 miles on the hull. That was not the fault of the prop but spendy still. I never noticed any reverse degradation going from my fixed three blade to the folder. The Max-Prop certainly has better backing power but I don’t understand why the emphasis on that capability. Maneuvering around the docks I try to plan my maneuvers such that I don’t need to do a crash stop. I think it was a British mag, Yachting Monthly, 2009 (don’t remember the month) that had a very comprehensive prop test. Max-Prop has the best backing power and flexofold had the least drag. Sail performance was best with the folder due to the least drag. Power performance was equal if I remember correctly. My 466 backs like it is on rails once I overcome the slight port pull..which I can use to my advantage if necessary. In the end I think it is a Ford Chevy issue. Cheers, MikeI was thinking about upgrading from factory prop to a feathering prop. Has anyone had success with a specific brand? There seems to be a lot of options out there.
Thank you
You remember the publication correctly - Folding and feathering propeller testI think it was a British mag, Yachting Monthly, 2009 (don’t remember the month) that had a very comprehensive prop test.
Just a comment I have a 2002 passage 456 flexofold , bought the p top at the bostvshow in 2011 boat had approx 260 hrs on the engine. American rep said nothing about testing the prop to confirm max rpm matches yanmar specs. Two years later my mach said I was over propped. Flexofold said it was my engine. I had engine compression tested and it checked out fine. No way to change pitch on a folding prop. Flexofold refused to swap blades. I have lived with this for 7 years. Finally found a set of used blades.I have a 20 x 14 three blade flexofold on my H466. I think you and I have the same 76 hp Yanmar. I cruise at 7.8 kts at 2750 rpm. At 3600 rpm I hit 8.6 but the fuel curve says 3.6 gph. At 2750 rpm the fuel consumption is 1.6-1.8 gph measured. A buddy with another H460 had a max prop but after having it rebuilt twice he switched to the flexofold. He also preferred the flexofold over his previous Max-Prop. That Max-Prop he sold to a H44 owner who loves it and has nearly 15000 miles on the hull. That was not the fault of the prop but spendy still. I never noticed any reverse degradation going from my fixed three blade to the folder. The Max-Prop certainly has better backing power but I don’t understand why the emphasis on that capability. Maneuvering around the docks I try to plan my maneuvers such that I don’t need to do a crash stop. I think it was a British mag, Yachting Monthly, 2009 (don’t remember the month) that had a very comprehensive prop test. Max-Prop has the best backing power and flexofold had the least drag. Sail performance was best with the folder due to the least drag. Power performance was equal if I remember correctly. My 466 backs like it is on rails once I overcome the slight port pull..which I can use to my advantage if necessary. In the end I think it is a Ford Chevy issue. Cheers, Mike
Maybe it is my tach but even when brand new with the factory 18 x 17 fixed three blade I never got more than 3600 rpm. I even had then Hunter's Dr. Destructo, Steve Pettengill aboard and he said 3600 was all I would ever get. But even so you are missing 400 rpm. What size FOF do you have?Just a comment I have a 2002 passage 456 flexofold , bought the p top at the bostvshow in 2011 boat had approx 260 hrs on the engine. American rep said nothing about testing the prop to confirm max rpm matches yanmar specs. Two years later my mach said I was over propped. Flexofold said it was my engine. I had engine compression tested and it checked out fine. No way to change pitch on a folding prop. Flexofold refused to swap blades. I have lived with this for 7 years. Finally found a set of used blades.
The props are great but if you have added a arch, solar panels, etc and live aboard you better be sure to run the boat up right after having it installed so that if you can't get the specified rpms you can get the blades swapped out. I can only get 3200 rpm on my 75 hp turbo yanmar that's 600 rpm off. These are great props, not had any issues and have great power in reverse. But missing 600 rpm is a problem
Sorry 20×14 3rMaybe it is my tach but even when brand new with the factory 18 x 17 fixed three blade I never got more than 3600 rpm. I even had then Hunter's Dr. Destructo, Steve Pettengill aboard and he said 3600 was all I would ever get. But even so you are missing 400 rpm. What size FOF do you have?
That is exactly what I have. At WOT on my 2003 H466, brochure displacement 26,000 lbs I achieve 8.6 kts at 3550 rpm. I figure my cruising displacement is 29,000lbs.Sorry 20×14 3r