Does anyone know what the original bowstem anchor roller looked like on an oday 35? Not sure if mine was original to the boat. This is
Attachments
-
15.4 KB Views: 268
![]() | ||
Made with 100% high-polished Stainless Steel, this beauty is able to ship within 3-6 weeks. What a Show-Piece! | ||
Email Friend | Price: $1,550.00 | |
Measure the SS tangs on other similar boats. It will be close enough.Yes that is what I am thinking. The cast may be original but I’m not sure. To convert to a ss strap I think I would need to know more about the load requirements it I don’t know how to go about this.
Was the forstay connected to the SS strap or the cast aluminum bow roller?Here is a pic of our previously owned 84 O'Day 37 bow roller. It is cast aluminium and the forestay strap is ss. I'm sure that it is original and is probably the same that is on the 35.
View attachment 172549
Are you able to send me a picture of it? If it has the same dimensions, I may be able to use it as a template for a new SS one.I removed a bowroller that looks a lot like that one. It’s sitting in my garage.
My problem with this is I'm not sure what base alloy is most often used on these connections. I used to think they were usually just 316 stainless steel, but recently I've been discovering that 17-4 PH may be used. The difference is quite notable. 316 has a UTS of about 80 ksi and 17-4 PH in the H900 condition (the most commonly used condition) has a UTS of 190 ksi. Notable difference.Measure the SS tangs on other similar boats. It will be close enough.
You might be over thinking a bit. The bow tang will not have more pressure on it than the breaking strength of the forestay. The forestay is likely either 316 or 304. If the tang is larger than the forestay, then it will be safe. Here's a chart showing breaking strengths of 316 wire: Wire Breaking Strength - Hayn EnterprisesMy problem with this is I'm not sure what base alloy is most often used on these connections. I used to think they were usually just 316 stainless steel, but recently I've been discovering that 17-4 PH may be used. The difference is quite notable. 316 has a UTS of about 80 ksi and 17-4 PH in the H900 condition (the most commonly used condition) has a UTS of 190 ksi. Notable difference.
Does anybody know what base alloy is actually used on structural hardware like these connections?
dj
Have we met? Hahaha - good observation!You might be over thinking a bit.