I actually don't plan to pull the trigger until next spring. But I suspected that the best buys on boats next spring could very well be the ones that were listed six to 18 months prior, so I started compiling a list of boats that caught my eye as they came on the market to track them over time. That's when I noticed that if the boat came up for sale but was listed at something around the NADA value, it was gone in a week or two. If it was overpriced according to NADA, it's still on the market months later.The other side of your argument is that you've been trying to buy a boat for a year using the NADA pricing and are still looking.
Would you sell your current boat for what NADA says it's worth?
And yes, when I look up the value of my current boat on NADA, I believe it seems to be a perfectly fair price. Maybe the numbers are more accurate for Hunters because so many were made. I'll certainly listen to what my broker tells me would be a fair market price, but in the final analysis, when I consider my slip payment, insurance, bottom maintenance, utilities, etc., it costs me at least $500 to $600 a month to own the boat even if nothing breaks. So when I want to sell it, I'll want to SELL it, and not hold out for 18 to 24 months to get some price I know the boat is worth, but end up having to eat an additional $8K to $10K in monthly costs to do it. Listing at NADA and having it gone in a week or two works very nicely for me.
I value the opinions and discussion. I'm coming to suspect that there is more validity in looking at NADA values for some boats, not so much for others. I'm not in the Sabre/Caliber market. I'd love to be, but I also love not having to work for a living and being able to pay cash for everything. So I live in the Hunter/Catalina/Beneteau world, where it seems that my observation holds true that $NADA = Sold boat, >$NADA = Boat sits on market a long time.
It definitely sounds though like having access to this soldboats thing would be nice to have.