Mariner motor weight

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

Wayne Randolph

I'm going to replace an old Chrysler 9.9 elec. start (c. 70 lbs.) with a new Toyhatsu 9.8 elec. start at c. 60 lbs. (2 stroke) or same at c. 80+ lbs. (4 stroke). Are advantages of 4 stoke worth additional weight beyond battery at 10 and captain at 160 lbs. all in the stern of a Mariner? Wife needs elec. start, we don't race, and know advantages of 4 vs. 2 stokes. The question is weight. Any advice? Thanks
 
M

Mike

Consider this...

I don't think the extra weight of the four stroke will make a diff. in sailing/stability. However, when I was going through this same calculation last year, I discovered two things that tipped me towards buying a new two-stroke over a four. First, the weight-carrying capacity of your motor mount is not the only consideration. Four strokes generate so much more torque than a two, the mount must be specifically rated to handle four strokes. Mine wasn't. Second, my wife had enough trouble raising and lowering the weight of a two stroke; she definetly would have even more trouble with the added weight of a four stroke. The Admiral has always wanted assurances that she could handle and start the motor on her own; a four would have made that more physically difficult. A four will probably start more easily, run more quietly, use less gas and won't require you to mix fuel. Balance that against a lower initial cost for a two stroke, cheaper and easier service, lighter weight, etc.
 
W

Warren

Two Stroke

Its a sailboat, not a motor boat! I would go for the two stroke.....less weight. The advantage of the four stroke will only come into play if you are doing alot (and I mean alot!) of motoring. Good Luck!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.