Kids (I think 13 and under) are already required to wear PFDs here in Connecticut.
That is also true in Virginia
Kids (I think 13 and under) are already required to wear PFDs here in Connecticut.
Totally agree.I disagree with this being mandated. It should be a personal decision as to when and where one dons a PFD. I agree with mandating that they be available but not worn. Would this be only while under way ...everyone on the boat ..even while inside...while anchored out..sleeping ......doing the wild thing......no ....going too far.
Obviously there's a problem here....somewhere.....about 700 people each year die while boating, a figure that is down significantly from an annual high of about 3,000 in previous years.
Hard to enforce? This is "click-it or ticket month in MD, and I got nabbed last June a block from Herrington Harbor, in front of the Happy Harbor after getting a few quick things at WM.I, for one, amd not much concerned as this seems to be a very hard to enforce law. Similar to the seatbelt laws on the books.
So bad laws are okay, as long as they're hard to enforce?I, for one, amd not much concerned as this seems to be a very hard to enforce law. Similar to the seatbelt laws on the books.
So a contractor pays the Government a direct fee to have the right to collect your fee, the government has no further obligation, and THAT ISN'T the most lucrative for your government?In Canada . . . the test is administered by private contractors, so it's not exactly lucrative for the government. . . .
Welcome to Maryland!. . . all PFDs must have attached to them ... a whistle, flares, a flash light, emergency water, a personal EPIRB, and a water proof bag carrying a "Twinky" or other suitable nourishment . . .
Didn't say that... I said that private contractors give the test and can issue the card. Some $$ goes to the gov't, but not alot, I imagine.So a contractor pays the Government a direct fee to have the right to collect your fee, the government has no further obligation, and THAT ISN'T the most lucrative for your government?
To say the least !!! The afloat Coast Guard is very, very busy doing, and doing well, the HS and safety at sea missions and has little time to worry about this nonsense, and by extension from another thread, discharge of shower water by yachts. The real problem is that every harbormaster, "marine patrol" (whatever that is), and municipal law enforcement on the water, will be waiting to pounce on boats everywhere for violations, which of course will enrich their coffers. Thus this becomes analogous to the 55 mph speed limit. How many remember that? The 55 mph limit was simply a means by which every state police and municipal police could give out $100 tickets whenever the mood struck them since everybody drove more than 55. And btw, be assured that this power grab is not the uniformed Coast Guard's idea but rather the civilian side of the CG, which now reports to their civilian counterparts in DHS. Remember DHS? They are the guys groping your "junk" at the airport. Someday maybe we will wake up. Please respond to the BOAT US call for comments on this.So when was the last time everybody was pulled over by the USCG for something administrative? I have never been stopped by them (knock on wood) and only seen then on the bay two or three times, mostly doing the weekend warrior ships in a row stuff.
I, for one, amd not much concerned as this seems to be a very hard to enforce law. Similar to the seatbelt laws on the books.
Bill,So when was the last time everybody was pulled over by the USCG for something administrative? I have never been stopped by them (knock on wood) and only seen then on the bay two or three times, mostly doing the weekend warrior ships in a row stuff.
I, for one, amd not much concerned as this seems to be a very hard to enforce law. Similar to the seatbelt laws on the books.