Thanks Heinzir
from
http://www.boats.com/reeds/jsp/rn_ch_2_b.jsp
"Jurisdiction Limits
The term "Navigable Waters of the United States" includes all waters navigable continuously from the high seas, including where access is by canals and locks. Also included are bodies of water that cover two or more states which, although not accessible from the ocean, are capable of "interstate commerce." Waters other than as defined above are not subject to federal jurisdiction and are regulated only by the states and their political subdivisions."
I may be reading this wrong but it seems to say that Inland Rules do not directly apply to lakes that are entirely contained within one state and do not have a navigable connection to the sea.
Thanks for the back up Heinzir.
I had done my homework on this a while ago and was surprised to find out just this. There are boundaries all over the place inland where the rules apparently change to local (State) jurisdiction. This was all chewed over thoroughly in past Dinius threads so I won't go over it now.
Suffice to say that I agree 100% that Perdock was in the wrong with no justification for running a powerboat at speed in the dark with a load of alcohol on board his body. The behavior of his peers in public service, if it proven to interfere with obtaining his blood alcohol level in a timely fashion and perhaps even tampering with evidence (the sailboat was not properly secured as a crime scene until the following day from what I recall), was appalling.
I have operated a power boat on a lake at night before and if it is on a plane you are going too fast.