Huh?
C'mon David, a 150 isn't a 'racing' sail, it's just a sail. Of course it's best for lighter air but as I said, if those are the conditions that Jeff sees frequently why shouldn't he consider it? If you're in San Francisco or the Carribean trades then a 110 certainly might be a more sensible choice. In the lighter air here on the Florida Gulf Coast there's a strong argument for additional sail area. The sails you need correspond to the conditions you see. That's all.As for the iron genny, if we can reach our destination safely (say, before dark) by sail, then I'm not really interested in how much faster my diesel will get it done. We bought our boat to sail to our destinations. We love being underway. Further, while we only log about 1500 miles a year, many serious cruisers who cover long offshore distances don't often have the range to simply motor to weather in which case a sail inventory that allows effective upwind sailing is essential.As for the asymetrical, you don't have to convince me, we love ours. As long as we're helping Jeff spend his money I vote for both the asymetrical *and* the bigger headsail.Finally, I don't know about the foam luff genoas that you've sailed but ours furls pretty nicely. A recent overnighter going hard to weather with an unexpected 30 knots over the deck (with gusts higher) a double reefed main and heavily furled 150 had us moving between 6 and 6.5 with a nice motion at 15 degrees heel for several hours. Would a 110 have been better that night? Sure. But the 150 did the job very well, allowed us to sail to windward in the zephyrs the next day, all without having to have an additional headsail onboard. We *know* it works well (for us.)