Hunter Bashing - A Cruiser's Perspective
We just returned from a 5-month trip from Charleston, SC to Guadeloupe back to Jacksonville, FL aboard our Hunter 410. This is our third Hunter and I may be overly simplifying things a bit, but I think both sides are correct. Before we left Charleston, I had only minor issues with Hunter, their design, and their production techniques. I've bored holes through the hulls and decks and I'm convinced that both are structurally sound. After pounding seas through the thorny path, I'm also convinced that the keel isn't going to fall off, the rudder is not going to just break without hitting something, and the rigging is going to hold up to virtually anything the hull will survive. With that said, the modern wide, flat beam doesn't provide the most comfortable ride in confused seas, and in following seas the boat requires a bit more tending. Below, things can move around a lot, including the crew when trying to work their way to the heads. And finally, all that beautiful joinery will begin to try to work its way against the hardware holding it all together as the hull gets racked by large waves. That's just the price you pay for having a voluminous interior.
All that may sound like Hunter bashing, but I'm just trying to point out that Hunters may not be built as rigidly as more expensive non-production boats. If you're not going to take the Hunter offshore for months in rough seas, then you'll probably never realize any of its shortcomings. And even if you do take it through the thorny path, it'll probably bring you back safely, just not as comfortably as some other boats. We love our Hunter for all its comfort in light seas, but we don't want to take it to the Caribbean again. That pretty well sums it all up. By the way, we saw two other 410's in St. Martin and Nevis, and only a handful of other Hunters in the Bahamas and Caribbean.
To get an idea of how my wife felt about the passages, you can read our blog at svctime.blogspot.com.
Daniel
s/v C-Time