Hunter 260 vs 1991 Macregor 26s

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 16, 2009
64
2 260 Lake Pleasant
This past Sunday was our maiden voyage on our 2000 Hunter 260. Our previous boat was a 1991 Macgregor 26s water ballast swing keel. This is the older model Macgregor 26s not the new 26X or M power/sail boat.Here are some of my first time comments and observations and some comparisons of the two.

Trailering –

We tow with a chevy truck with tow package. The hunter tows at 2X the weight of the Mac so you know it is back there. Highway towing at 65 mph was not problem and smooth. We did go though some construction zones, that caused me to tighten up a little, especially the signs but no incidents.
Stepping the mast

We practice a few times (5 to be exact) at home getting the whole process done and the admiral developed the checklist so we had it down pretty well. When we got to the marina there were 3 other sail boats doing the same. The Mac 26s has a mast raising system but it is a much lighter mast and we generally man handled it up. We could rig and be ready for sail in 20 – 30 minutes. For the Hunter we use three people and the trailer winch….one on winch one on deck and the admiral observing and critiquing. Two or three cranks then check lines ,side stay buckles and repeat to mast is up. We received a standing ovation form the two of the other boats as we had the mast up in less than 20 minutes We were up, rigged for sailing and loaded within an hour. Not racing just slow and careful and all went as planned.

Launching

The Mac 26s was a dream to launch. With one on the boat one in the truck, we could get back the trailer in, drop the keel and motor off. I was not sure with the height of the Hunter’s water line, when on the trailer, how far I would have to take the truck in get her to float. Our ramp is a 6:1 so all the math worked without extending the trailer tongue. Backed the Hunter in, back tires hit the water, stern floated off the trailer. …checked to see of there was enough room to lower the rudder, did the rudder dance putting the rudder down. Started the kicker and backed her off the trailer. I was not sure how the heavier hunter would handle with no keel and no ballast….she backed and steered like a dream…within the protected area of the launch site. The Hunter actually handled better than the Mac under these conditions due to the bigger rudder. Once clear of the loading dock, dropped the keel and open the water ballast. The Hunter seemed to fill much faster. With the Mac, I had time to tend to other matters but the Hunter filled in ½ the time or less.

Marina steering.

This was my biggest concern. I have a tiller 260 and do not like to have the outboard as slave to tiller. Our ramp areas tend to get fairly crowded and require some maneuvering while waiting for the driver. With the outboard tightened ( not locked ) into a straight position, the Hunter handles great. With the stock keel I could take it very slow and still have steering control. The Mac was very responsive in these conditions but you had to watch for prop and tiller impact on hard turn to port.. With the Hunter motor locked off straight there is no way the rudder can impact the rudder so steer away. I had to navigate around a few waiting boats and did so with ease. To pick up the driver I just gave the boat a little kick about a hundred yards out and she guided into the guest slip with the motor running in neutral, quick reverse kick at the end and she just edged up. The Hunter is much bigger and with the added weight and larger rudder it seemed to provide more control with less drift and prop walk than the Mac. I prefer the Hunter to the Mac around the marina.

Sailing

Our Mac is a great sailing boat. It is fast, responsive and we could consistently hold her over 6knts. Reefed, she handled 25 knot winds and sailed great if you kept a hold of her and worked the sail trim. We have a tiller steering Hunter. I actually prefer tiller steering as it has more room in the cockpit and with the tiller extension I was sailing form the catbird seat most of the day. The Hunter has a much different sail plan than the Mac 26s. We need some time together so she can teach me how she likes to be handled. The biggest issue to get use to is the lower position of the mainsheet cleet. With the ring on the floor the angle of the release took some getting use to to be able to pop the line. This is also my first experience with the jib furler, so we have some learning to do to get it all dialed in.

It was a perfect sailing day. 10 – 15 knot winds and fairly consistent. The Hunter is a bit tender, like the Mac, but settles in very quickly at a nice 10 - 15 degree heel. It does not accelerate as quickly as the Mac, but once in the grove it hold its line much better when cutting through the wake/chop of a powerboat lake. The Hunter has less weather helm and she holds a heel much cleaner. The Mac is much quicker to tact in low winds and more forgiving if you loose power. The Hunter sails good on a close haul but about 3-5 degree loser than the Mac when tight to weather. That may be my inexperience with the Hunter and/or the furler. Overall, IMHO, the Mac sails faster with more feel, but the Hunter sets in much cleaner and holds its line and seems less tender. Even though they have pretty close to the same rating, I am pretty sure I could out sail a Hunter with my Mac 26s., but that was not the goal of why we purchased our Hunter and may just be my experience.

Cove time

There is no comparison between the two boats when discussing cabin and cockpit. I prefer the tiller steering as it open up the cockpit and my roots in racing cats. The sugar scoop makes the Hunter so much more enjoyable for swimming. The cabin allows four to six people to comfortably eat lunch and get out of the sun with plenty of room for that mandatory afternoon knap. As far as creature comforts, the Hunter is it. The storage allows up to find a place for everything we need and is accessible. With the Mac we found, or made storage, but it often required shifting things around to get to one item or another. The hunter can easily handle 6 adults on a day sail and 4 adults and 2 kids on an overnighter. The enclosed head provides the privacy and comfort to make the ladies comfortable. The Hunters overall cabin layout is great, yes even the table. This is the biggest area of improvement and the main reason we went bought the Hunter. She did not disappoint in anyway.

Loading

Our Mac was a 3 minute process, We often drove the Mac on the trailer, hooked the bow and off we went. Our Hunter trailer does not have any goal post and it was our first loading experience. Getting it all lined, especially the keel required us to have the cradle partially exposed to keep the keel centered. All in all we got it in less than 20 minutes which is not bad for the first time. Kind of hard to practice that one at home. With some trailer improvements I am sure we can get this down. The Hunter will now take the place of the Mac at the mast up lot so no demisting required.

Overall

Whereas these are both 26 ft boats they are very different and designed for different uses. Depending on you situation I would choose one over the other. For a boat that you will trailer to and from the lake each time you sail, the Mac 26s is a great boat and would be my choice. I could have the Mac ready to sail in less than 20 minutes with 2 people and 30 minutes single handled. At 1500 lbs towing it requires only a small vehicle and can launch just about anywhere. I would not use the Hunter 260 as a boat I trailer to the lake every weekend for a day sail. I would either leave it in a mast up lot or in a slip and have the flexibility to trail on those special occasions… in our case, a run over to Catalina or San Diego. Both boats are C class boats I know many people sail the Mac 26s on coastal waters but I would feel more comfortable keeping it to inland lakes and protected harbors. I will take the Hunter on a costal sail or to Catalina Island with few reservations but care.

The Mac 26s is a very easy boat for single handled sailing. For a couple or family with kids, the 26s is a very economical way to enjoy day and weekends and have the freedom to go anywhere. It is a great learning boat as it is very easy to sail and very forgiving. Not trying to place a challenge but IMHO I still think the Mac 26s will out sail the Hunter on a course but The Hunter is where I want to be when at the docks or in the cove for the night.

Just my thoughts and observations….comments and challenges always welcome.
Tim
 
Last edited:

MikeH

.
Jan 7, 2004
153
Hunter 260 Perrysburg, OH
Tim, I think you have a very balanced review there. I am only generally familiar with the 26s; we looked at it when we were choosing boats but didn't have the storage or floor plan that we were looking for.

We opted for a 260 and find many of the pros and cons you mentioned. I've raised the mast with two people in 15 minutes, and lowered it alone in 15. I find launching her on a steep ramp to be a challenge and marina steering satisfactory. I'd add that I find the 260 less maneuverable and responsive when reversing than than going forward.

Tacking in light air in a 260 can be painful; she's not a light air boat (at least mine isn't). But for what we use her for, sailing on Lake Erie and to the islands, overnighting and family enjoyment, it works great.

Thanks for the great review!
 
Aug 11, 2006
1,446
Hunter H260 Traverse City
Excellent assessment.

I've raced Mac26s more than once with my H260 and I always pull away eventually. It is hard to compare the two boats because there are so many versions of the Mac26 but I found a spec sheet for the M26S which shows a SAD of 17.8 vs 17.5 for the H260. Based on this, I think the two boats are comparable. In a longer race in higher winds my experience is the H260 will eventually pull well ahead of the M26. That said, both are great family boats. Althought both are great family boats neither can be considered very fast and will usually be found at the back of the pack.

I assume you've visited the Hunter 260 website at http://h260.com. One thing you might want to do right away to ease the problem of centering the boat on the trailer is to look at the method outlined at this link: http://h260.com/trailer/trailer1/trailer1.html

Welcome to the H260 club

Mike: I can't believe we have the same boat: My h260 manuevers MUCH better in reverse than going forward.
 
Last edited:
B

bart

launching

I generally sail alone. So I am launching alone. I always use the trailer extension. Extending the trailer is the last thing I do before backing down. I pull the pin, chock the tire, and drive. When it stops, then I replace the pin, retrieve my chock, and go launch.
I use a 50' line hooked the forward cleat and to the ladder on the trailer. Unhook the winch cable. When you get to the water and the boat is in the water, just hit the brakes. the boat usually slides right off.
Retrieving the boat is a little more complicated. I have added 2 short uprights on the trailer which force the boat to the center of the trailer. Be careful. The front roller supports are exposed and put a nasty scratch on the hull.
One thing you might want to consider adding is a bimini. I suffered though the hot summers in Western South Carolina for a number of years before adding one. It was a great investment.
 
Mar 16, 2009
64
2 260 Lake Pleasant
Bimini has been ordered and on its way.

Yes I have gouged the boat on those raisers, first scratches hurt the worst.

We are enjoying the boat and making our personal improvements. Some mandadtory other just because.

Thanks

Tim
 
Aug 11, 2006
1,446
Hunter H260 Traverse City
Tim, this is an excellent review of the two boats.

I looked up the spec for the M26s and the H260. According to the US Sailing website calculator, the 4000 lb Mac 26S has a SAD of 17.8. while the 5000 lb Hunter 260 has a SAD of 17.5. The two boats seem to be comparable on this measure.

My understanding is that a boat with a higher value will accelerate better and be a better light air performer but be more sensitive to loading, likely to have a less comfortable ride in a sea, and will need to shorten sail sooner.
 
Last edited:
May 16, 2007
1,509
Boatless ! 26 Ottawa, Ontario
SA\Disp ratio

George, actually a MacGregor 26S only weighs 1650 lbs with 1200 lbs of water ballast for a total weight of only 2850 lbs, so the ratio is 18.75 while the ratio for the H260 is 17.5. This is for a Mac with the stock 100% jib, most Macs are running a 135 or 150% genoa and so most would have a much better ratio. I think all the H260's have the 100% jib. I sailed a 26S for the past 5 years and am just learning to sail my new H260.

My feelings right now are the Mac was able to tack much more quickly and really accelerate out of the tack. The effects are more apparent in lighter winds. Looking at the PHRF ratings for the two boats they look to be well matched.

I think the big difference between the boats is in motion comfort ratio, the Mac is 11.43 while the H260 is 17.2, the higher the number the more comfortable the ride will be.

It seems these formulae take into account the sail area and weight, but not the mast height and effects of extra roach. The Mac has a mush shorter mast and carries the sails a lot lower. It would be interesting to know the CE of the main sail for each boat and how many pounds of force on the top of the mast would be required to hold the boat on her rail.

Water ballasted boats do suffer in light air, I think that is good justification to own an asymmetrical spinnaker on the Mac or Hunter.

I'm looking forward to sailing the Hunter in both light and heavy winds and hope it will be as much fun to sail as my Mac 26S was.

Bob
 
Aug 11, 2006
1,446
Hunter H260 Traverse City
Re: SA\Disp ratio

Correct: Bad data. I was using the 26M data which gives it a SAD of 17.8.

The data I have says the Mac 26s comes with a 236 sq ft sail which is pretty small but that still gives the Mac an 18.8 SAD and if you add a bigger jib that would push it up even more.

I did not think to look at the PHRF ratings - I think this is probably a better measure than trying to use the calcualtor because there are so many variations of the Mac26 and different sail plans.

The H260 Avg PHRF rating is 219 while the Mac Avg ranges from 213-228. Close enough for the two boats to be comparable. BTW the other water ballast boat the Catalina 250's average is 225 a little slower maybe but still in the same ballpark.

Since the Mac 26s would become overloaded sooner and have to reduce sail sooner. This validates my personal experience sailing with several different Macs in the north channel. Where we would gradually pull ahead in normal sailing conditions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.