Yes, risk management is the answer. If I have to pass through there I'll do it in a 747 at 35,000 ft.
I so wish to fit a phalanx system on the 25.A 25mm chain gun is also very effective but some people question your motives.
IN the real world, you don't go there or through the straits of Malaka in south east asia. You plan an alternate path or turn way south at points prior to these. Now those choices cause additional mileage, weather and provisions to be addressed, so some just chance it. Two choices, but that is what the real world does.I think it would be interesting to hear from someone with actual, real world experiece with the problem.
Here's a possible vessel for the new Nemo:The world needs a modern version of Captain Nemo and the Nautilus to go vigilante on the pirates.
stupid pirates fired on a Navy warship (believe it was a Frigate)Anybody going through that area is taking a big risk...unless on a big gray ship that says "US Navy" on it.
Yes...."just don't go there" that's the bail out answer, you have a flair for the obvious ... but... what if you have no choice. There may be any number of valid reasons you may have to transit a dangerous area.IN the real world, you don't go there or through the straits of Malaka in south east asia. You plan an alternate path or turn way south at points prior to these. Now those choices cause additional mileage, weather and provisions to be addressed, so some just chance it. Two choices, but that is what the real world does.
Now that's a little better.. some actual suggestions.By going around.
West to East trip: I think a yacht could sailed thru the Suez canal and Gulf, around the Southern tip of the Sinai then up to the port city of Al Haql, Saudi Arabia to be trucked across Saudi Arabia to a port in the Arabian Gulf.
I'd try to fly from the drop off port to the pick up port. The ride would be interesting the first hour or so and then long and boring and hot.
You'd need a sponsor for the visas and documentation for the boat but the Saudi Embassy should be able to help with that. Ching ching$$$.
Stick to the Omani side of the Strait of Hormuz and everything should be smooth as snot.
Or sail the Southern route.
If we really want to fix this thing we should hire the Russians. They know how to deal with these people and don't care about world opinion.
So far, there are two Legend class National Security Cutters in commission, homeport CG Station Alameda, California. Nice weapons for a cutter, a 57mm auto cannon and a 20mm CIWS gattling gun, both computer controlled and radar guided. Third NSC is in the builder's yard in Mississippi. Three more in various stages of contract.Just crtuise in a modern Coast Guard Cutter with a full crew and munitions load.
You get to be an armchair quarterback by not venturing to dangerous places, places you have been warned against going and are known to be extremely hazardous to your health.I think it would be interesting to hear from someone with actual, real world experiece with the problem. Just saying "don't go there" is obtuse. A more specific suggestion is needed... like if you don't go there, where do you go? No offence to you armchair speculators of course.
You get to be an armchair quarterback by not venturing to dangerous places, places you have been warned against going and are known to be extremely hazardous to your health.
You call it "obtuse" I'd call it good judgment.
You have been given the best options...whether you like or agree with them is another thing.I don't think anyone will argue that it not the best place to sail which is why I said "safer" and not "safe". There is a major difference.
Just not going there is similar to telling fat people to just not eat. There is a plethora of other options between the polar ends that might be interesting to discuss and hear about.