Heaving To (some of the finer points)
With regard to Don's comments: we have never had any trouble heaving both our Legend 43 ("Rivendel II") or Bob Buchanan's Legend 33.5 ("Windtryst") to in force 7 or 8 winds plus big waves and/or swells. Whether we would even want to consider heaving to in Force 9, 10 or higher is questionable, given that our Galerider drogue and Paratech sea anchor do provide us with safer options; particularly against the risk of coming beam to the waves and perhaps being rolled.I agree with Gary's description of the heave-to process primarily being a battle between rudder and jib. For the purpose of this discussion, however, not only the genoa but any surfaces forward of the CLR (Center of Lateral Resistance) that try to make the bow blow off (while hove to) should be considered as "jibs". Similarly, any wind resistance aft of the CLR that tends to make the vessel round up (e.g. a more or less strongly reefed main or trysail) will tend to help the rudder win. A year or two ago there were several long discussions on usenet, e.g. on the rec.boats.cruising newsgroup, from which I quote the following segments which may provide some food for thought here:"(Fred Leverton's, 1997 post) I once "hove to" in winds of 45-50 knots gusting over 60 knots in a 28ft. fin keel yacht. No sails up at all, tiller lashed down to lee. The boat would come up almost head to wind with wind pressure on mast alone, then fall off 30 - 40 degrees until there was enough drive to bring her up to the wind again. Did this for about 4 hours until theworst of the storm had passed. The movement of the boat was quitecomfortable, in fact I went below and had breakfast whilst weatheringthe storm".(Ken Maki asked Fred Leverton

Also, any experience combining both methods (i.e. drogues and heaving-to)? Seems like a droque/sea anchor would reduce the "yo-yo" effect and rate of drift while heaved-to.(Since Fred did not respond Henk Meuzelaar commented to Ken Maki

Both the "yo-yoing" (yawing) and the "drift" (actually a combination ofmaking way and drifting) are essential to the mechanism of the heaving-toprocess. In an environment where the forces and directions of wind andwaves vary every second a truly stable boat position can only beachieved by being hard aground.The clever trick of heaving to is that the two corrective principles: (1)rudder action (progressively stronger as the vessel bears off and startsmaking more headway); and (2) windage before the mast (progressivelystronger as the vessel heads up and windward bow with or withoutbackwinded jib spill less wind), do not have to be perfectly matched, oreven in phase, to achieve the amazing equilibrium we call "hove to".Under perfectly stable wind and wave conditions it is conceivable thatthe vessel stops yawing and slowly makes way ( drifts) in a more or lessstraight line. However, one cannot permanently take all headway offwithout completely depowering the rudder and thus breaking the hove-toposition.Although headway is an essential part of heaving to, the amount of speedcan be increased by: increasing headsail area; sheeting in the main(assuming it was still hoisted); running the engine slowly in forward,and - presumably - by centering the rudder a bit more. All of these(except increasing the headsail area) may make the rudder powerful enoughto force a tack and break the hove-to position. Diminishing speed can beeffected by reducing head sail area (if necessary, relying solely on thesail-like action of the windward bow), increasing rudder and propellordrag, or employing a special drag device from stern or quarter. All ofthese (except reducing head sail area) depower the rudder far more thanthe sail, thus risking a loss of the hove-to position and, possibly, ajibe.(afterwards, yet another sailor commented that he simply lets the clew of the backwinded jib slip a bit to leeward to depower the jib; IMHO this is a great idea).Finally, allow me to give a recent example of successful fine-tuning of the heave-to position:A few months ago "Rivendel II" was hove to on rudder and staysail, several hundred NM off the NorthEast coast of Australia in 30-40 knot tradewinds and big swells. Because of electrical problems (dead house batteries) we were trying to figure out whether to continue on to Vanuatu or to return to Queensland. HOW's very own George Kornreich was on board as a crew member and can attest that "Rivendel II' held the heave-to without any problem, except for the uncomfortable motion caused by confused seas which would tend to bring us beam to the swells from time to time. According to the above-cited wisdom we either needed to depower the jib or power up the rudder in order to keep the bow more directly into wind and waves. When letting the staysail clew slip a bit to leeward did not help enough we hoisted the triple-reefed main and put just a little tension on the mainsheet. This did the trick and gave us time to come to a consensus (we ended up sailing back to Queensland for battery replacement).Flying Dutchman"Rivendel II"