Furling Mainsail

Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Larry Dean

Does anyone out there have any experience with an older 1988 Selden Furlex furling mainsail setup? I saw a boat for sale (Cal 28) with this installation but I'm unfamiliar with the pros and cons (besides lack of battens). I'm certain the original sail would need replacement but I don't know what to expect with any problems with the furling system. Also, the boat has a boomkicker. I guess this is a plastic version of a hard boomvang. Can the boomkicker be replaced?
 
A

Augie Byllott

I can't help you with the specific furling system, but you are right about the battens. The roach area is lost. If the boom will allow, perhaps a longer foot on the new sail could provide an offset. With respect to the kicker, most marine catalogs carry them.
 
W

Walt Allensworth

Convenience vs. performance

If you sail upwind alot you may not like a furling mail - it really depends on how demanding you are about boat performance. The lack of battens means the main will not be flat along the leach, and it tends to 'cup' the wind. SO.... if you crank the main in to run close-hauled it tends to make you heal-over alot without going any faster. You'll find yourself saying "But my old boat would point higher!" On the flip side, if you're short-handed it is SOOOOOO much easier & safer to shorten sail by just cranking in 2-3 feet. You never have to leave the cockpit. For me it comes down to a trade-off between performance and convenience, with a touch of concern for reliability. (I.E. what happens if something fails with the furling gear and you can't bring the main in?). In the balance, I think it's a good trade-off for coastal cruising couples. For a round-the-world cruiser with more than two on-board, I'd probably go with a traditional system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.