What do we mean by slow?
I'd like to return to the question of "slow" regarding Catalina 22 and other boats, namely the Potter 15 (P-15), since I'm the one who brought it up initially. I got around to looking for the PHRF rating for a P-15 only to discover what I probably knew but had forgotten--yachts under 20 ft typically aren't rated as they mostly compete in one-design classes. For the "newbies", PHRF stands for Performance Handicap Racing Fleet. Essentially, it handicaps different boat designs so they can be raced against each other "fairly." It assumes that the boats are race "optimized": clean bottoms, good sails of the correct sizes, and a capable, practiced crew. If two different boats where raced "perfectly" by their respective skippers and crews, then they should "tie" (I'm over simplifying) at the end of race on what is called "corrected time." Boats with lower ratings are faster than those with higher ratings.I found a recent action to rate the Potter-19 at 270 in Northern California. In a recent race series in the San Francisco Bay area, a P-15 was assigned a PHRF of 274. Catalina 22 usually rates around 270 depending on whether or not it has a swing keel. However, PHRFs can be area-specific, so what they are on Lake Ontario could be different.If the C-22 "owes" 4 seconds per mile (i.e., 274-270) to the P-15, then over a 10-mile race the boats would "tie" if the P-15 finished exactly 40 seconds behind the C-22. If the P-15 finished less than 40 seconds behind, or in front of the C-22, it would win. My first point is that the P-15 is evidently not a knot slower than the C-22 from an assessment of its average performance capabilities, although it might at first be thought so from its theoretical hull speed which is about a knot less than the C-22. If over a 10-mile trip the C-22 made 5 knots, and the P-15 4 knots, the difference would be 30 min in arrival times rather than the mere 40 seconds predicted by PHRF.The second point--in my opinion, is that the P-15 is inherently a better sailing yacht (= more fun) in some conditions. It's light compared to the C-22, about 500 lb displacement compared to over a ton. As such it carries a much higher sail area to displacement ratio and much lower displacement to length of water line ratio. So, it's inherently a faster design. Back to the C-22. Compared to other 22 ft yachts it's a slug as I said previously. It apparently can barely outrun a boat 7 ft shorter than it and by comparison the Ranger 22/23 rates at 216; J-22 at 183; Cal 20 at 264; Capri 22 at 204, etc.Why lay it on the C-22? I feel that the C-22 is a convenient and inexpensive choice for the new sailor. It's availability and popularity make it a safe choice for inexperienced buyers, so they buy one. However, they will quickly outgrow the thing in my opinion if they pursue sailing with much enthusiasm. OK, sure, trade it in for another one but why not start with one that you will keep longer and probably enjoy more? It's all a big compromise, of course.BEO