Each bank gets what the alt is delivering. Impossible to have two different voltages through an argofet.. You would need an Orion TR Smart for that.How does an FET isolator, like Victron's Argofet handle different charging protocols? For example a house LFP bank is charing at 14.1v while the start AGM battery is at a float stage at 13.6v.
That does present a conundrum doesn't it. The alternator output would go first to the LFP house bank with the AGM start being charged by the Orion. This would work until the BMS dump and fried the Balmar alternator protection module. It would be wise then to carry an extra APM.Each bank gets what the alt is delivering. Impossible to have two different voltages through an argofet.. You would need an Orion TR Smart for that.
The APM is built for this. I was the one who pushed Balmar to build it and kept pushing them to do all the right testing. We had done plenty of it on our test bench but could only drive about 170A on our test bench. they are so confident in it they don’t even include a fuse.We saw too many Sterlings with blown fuses, and the owners never knew it had blown So the next time the BMS load dumped…..That does present a conundrum doesn't it. The alternator output would go first to the LFP house bank with the AGM start being charged by the Orion. This would work until the BMS dump and fried the Balmar alternator protection module. It would be wise then to carry an extra APM.
If I go the other direction, alt to start battery first, then I lose the advantage of a high output alt and LFP.
Hmmm.... decisions.
As I understand it, if the batteries communicate, if one dumps they all dump.I installed a Balmar APM when they first came out last year. I have conservative settings for the Balmar smart regulator, so I feel pretty safe with the alternator connected directly to the three lfp batteries. The batteries are parallel connected and each has its own bms. What are odds that all three of the bms would shut down and cause an alternator spike?
That'll be fine for the next generation.Technology evolves. Eventually all the regulators, isolators, chargers & BMS will be networked together and many of these limitations will be eliminated. Hopefully
I'm still waiting like everyone else too.That'll be fine for the next generation.![]()
Very effective on the first load dump. It is a one and done solution.A good solution might be to connect the alternator output to the LFP house bank and charge the start battery through a DC-DC charger. But the key is to use a Balmar APM. This is a little over simplified, but you get the idea.
How good is the APM at suppressing voltage spikes during a BMS disconnect?
Completely untrue . This is NOT their olderTSP…Very effective on the first load dump. It is a one and done solution.
Another spare part to carry.
Thank you! A long time ago I had a ZapStop and I understood that to be a one and done product, I incorrectly assumed the APM was similar.Completely untrue . This is NOT their olderTSP…
If I understand correctly, the Class T fuse protects against the spike and the APM protects the alternator. And If I had remembered what I read on the Balmar Site, I would have known the APM can "absorb multiple surges of such energy."But will the Balmar APM suppress the huge voltage spike that can fry sensitive electronics when the BMS disconnects?
I don’t believe this is the case with any internal BMS batteries. Victron Smart Batteries and Lithionics External BMS model, yes. But they have a single BMS communicating with the individual batteries.As I understand it, if the batteries communicate, if one dumps they all dump.