The types of battery applications IEEE and DOE are talking about are probably different than what sailboats need. For example, batteries used for “Backup Power Sources for DOE Facilities” probably don’t get cycled very often, but rather sit on a maintenance charger for months or years before being called into service. To be effective in our use case requires all of the same considerations as the DOE case, but deep cycling itself puts additional wear on the batteries. The effects of that additional wear will be greater or less depending on how effectively the boat’s systems address additional considerations that the DOE might not list, like depth of discharge, recharge rates, and time spent partially discharged.
Time spent partially discharged I'm sure is one major problem. However, every other point you mention is directly addressed.
The types of batteries are exactly the same - the application may be somewhat different. But not hugely different such that use of IEEE 450 would be negated. While it is true the DOE application does not cycle their batteries as often as we do, they do cycle them in a much more frequent time frame than you are suggesting. At least at Hoover dam they did. That was part of the maintenance schedule where the batteries had to be cycled as part of the maintenance schedule. I don't recall the frequency, But it was every few months or something like that. I'm trying to recall a conversation I had decades ago so the details, especially of details I didn't really care about, are definitely fuzzy.
My main point, is we seem to spend a lot of time throwing marketing type information back and forth rather than actual technical data. And there are sources of technical data that we are not tapping into.
For example, how does one know when an equalization phase has gone to completion? How do we know if that charger that has some proprietary program that claims to perform equalization is actually doing so, and doing so in a way that is truly beneficial to our batteries? We seem to simply get marketing answers, not solid technical answers.
What are the specifics on how long one can be at what % state of discharge before you get serious damage to your batteries? And how does one define serious damage? Where are the curves that talk about this? As I'm sure they indeed are complex functions that depend upon % discharge, temperature and time... We tend to spend a lot of time not really talking to these specifics.
Just my 2 cents worth.
dj