G
Gary Wyngarden
Is there a boat of your dreams out there? What if you had a chance to charter her for a few days?I've given a lot of thought to what would be the perfect boat for us. Of course it starts with intended use. We're not going to sail around the world or even to the South Pacific. Our cruising grounds are the waters from South Puget Sound to Alaska--mostly protected or semi protected waters with some open ocean stuff. We're not racers, but sailing performance is important. We spend months at a time on the boat so living comfort is important. We sail year around so protection from the elements is also a factor. And very critical to me is the ability to do single handed day sailing which means the boat can't be really big.I've been looking at Nauticats for a long time, attracted by both their quality reputation and their pilot house design which would enable us to sail completely shielded from our frequently cool rainy weather. But the Nauticats that appealed were too big and heavy to be good sailors and were definitely out of the question for single handed day sailing. But finally in 2003 they came out with a Nauticat 37 that had a design we liked with the pilothouse, and a displacement of only 19,200 pounds, and was small enough to singlehand. The first one finally made it to the West Coast for the Seattle Boat Show in January. I liked the boat a lot. The Admiral liked it even more. The broker said the boat would be in charter less than 20 miles from us right after the show. We decided to do the charter and just came back from three days out on her.The attached link gives a complete description of the boat. While the owner had been out on her a few times, we were the first charterers. Keep in mind the boat sells for more than $400,000.What we liked:The boat was very luxurious. The interior wood was beautiful. Lots of indirect lighting. It was extremely quiet. The motor was buried deep below the pilothouse sole. It would motor at 7 knots at 2000 rpm and you'd hardly hear the engine. Ditto for the fresh water pump. Ditto for the auto helm. Visibility from the pilothouse was great. All of the instruments, steering and throttle controls were repeated in the pilothouse and in the cockpit. Sitting up in the pilothouse at anchor or in a marina was great in terms of the deck level view as opposed to sitting down in the hull. Use of space on the boat, storage, etc. was fantastic. The aft cabin was extremely comfortable and cosy.What we didn't like:The boom was at least eight feet above deck level in order to clear the pilothouse and the spray dodger. Access to the boom just aft of the mast for flaking the main or taking off or putting on the sail cover, you were standing on the pilothouse windshield, slippery and at a 45 degree angle. The attachment of the main halyard to the headboard was probably twelve feet off the deck and required climbing two mast steps and a mast winch to get to it. While the cockpit was reasonably spacious, there were no comfortable seats with good back supports. Access to the engine require removal of carpeting, two locking floorboards, and two additional boards, just to check the oil, cooland level, etc. All engine work would have to be done standing on your head.And then there's the sailing and handling. She powered very well and was surpisingly maneuverable though not as maneuverable as my Hunter. In light to moderate winds, she sailed well and comfortably though again, not as well as my Hunter. What really disappointed me was her performance in heavier air. I had expected a Nauticat to be rock solid when the wind picked up. Our third day out we had 20 knot winds. Even before getting out in clear air, I buried the lee rail in 17-18 knots apparent with a reef in the main and the genoa rolled up to 100% of the foretriangle. To her credit there was very little weather helm, but the heel angle was excessive in my opinion. We crossed and recrossed Haro Strait in 20 knots of true wind with two reefs in the main and the genny rolled up to 100%. She handled that well, but I was surprised at the tenderness.So is this a boat I'd want to drop an incremental $300,000 on plus $50,000 in transaction costs? Don't think so.My new dream boat? A 1992 Hunter 37.5 named Wanderlust. The more I see and experience, the more I appreciate my own boat.Gary WyngardenS/V Wanderlust h37.5