I have noticed the Advertising (and, following the marketing, advice from forums like this one) have gone to bigger and bigger boats as the years go by. When I started "big-boat" (ie not dingies or runabouts) sailing over 30 years ago, a 27-ft Catalina was considered a "big boat" and perfectly adequate for a family of 4 to cruise Georgia Strait. An "entry level" boat would be something like a North Star 24, Columbia 22, or even a Cal 25. Now, I see just about everyone recommending at LEAST 30 ft or so as an "entry-level" boat.
Why? Well, it's fairly obvious from the mfr point of view: it doesn't cost THAT much more to build a 35 ft boat than a 27 ft boat, and they can charge 5 times the price. Why do sailors recommend bigger and bigger boats? I'm not sure...
One thing is that (maybe as we're getting older...?) we are depending more and more on Comfort and that which makes us comfortable. 30 years ago, it was unheard of to have air conditioning on your boat, and "shore power" was usually a 15A extension cord. Now we MUST have at least 30A, a Genset, a 1500W inverter... and the stove has to be 3-burner, with oven, microwave...GPS, AIS, chartplotter, VHF (mobile AND handheld), TV - the list goes on and on. I see it in camping as well: camping in a tent has been replaced by 30 ft travel trailers that have more appliances (and more room) than my last apartment.
And the unfortunate consequence of this is that young families can NO LONGER afford to go sailing. They go to the boat shows, look at the 40-ft, $1.5M boats, and walk away.
druid