Jack, you're misrepresenting ...
I read all the threads and I saw much valid criticism, but I don't think many wrote him off as a kook, as you might think. I was one who agreed with most of the criticism (maybe even all of it). Somebody even made the point that some of the most revered passage makers have had spectacular failures and sunk boats as well, only to triumph in later attempts.When you read his website, you can find many indications that Ken was thoughtful and dedicated in his approach to the attempt. He also made his weaknesses plain to see. He invited the scrutiny and I don't think anybody should apologize for their harsh criticism when they are valid.Somebody on here did suggest that all (us) armchair sailors just shut the #&%@ up because we aren't out there "doing it". Even that criticism may have some validity, although it was pretty immature.Actually, Ken sounds like he is a pretty cool guy and I would definitely buy and read his story if he found the way to pick himself off the mats and make a successful circumnavigation. I even suggested that it could be a very profitable story, but it appears that Ken isn't really into the commercial aspect of life. He can be admired for that and if his idea for the web service takes hold, that could be a good service.