Calculated Wind Speed Way Too High

Apr 25, 2024
478
Fuji 32 Bellingham
We've got a Garmin anemometer/vain tied into our plotter. (I will look up the model when my wife wakes up and I can get to our manuals.)

The only thing we really use is the ability for the system to estimate true wind speed and direction. Kind of handy when we are motoring along at hull speed and wondering if there is enough wind to sail.

Today, we were motoring almost directly into the wind at about 6.5 kts over ground. The while the wind vain was pointed directly into the apparent wind, and the plotter showed the correct apparent wind direction, it was reporting 12-14 kts true wind speed. The actual speed was definitely lower - probably in the 8 kt range.

At 6.5 kts over ground with a 12 kt head wind, the anemometer would have had to experience about 18.5 kts. It was spinning more like a good breeze. We stopped to see what winds were actually doing and, like I said, they were at about 8 kts.

So, the mystery to me is what would cause it to overestimate a head wind? I can understand underestimating - like if the anemometer was gummed up and turning slow. Or, if we were going downwind and the anemometer was running slow, that could cause an overestimating.

Very confused. And, this is new. It worked correctly (or at least not nearly so far off that I would notice) just a few months ago.

Any ideas?
 
May 17, 2004
5,619
Beneteau Oceanis 37 Havre de Grace
Garmin probably uses speed through the water, not speed over ground, for the true wind calculations. So if your speed log is calibrated wrong, or you were going against a significant current, the speed through the water would be unusually high, adding too much to the TWS.

Check your speed through the water compared to speed over ground to see if there’s an odd discrepancy. You could also check the reported TWS when going downwind, to get more data points to troubleshoot.
 
Apr 25, 2024
478
Fuji 32 Bellingham
I don't think the chart plotter is even connected to our knotmeter. But, that might just be an assumption. The paddlewheel is pretty come-and-go, as they tend to be. But, if the plotter was using that and not GPS, that would explain everything pretty neatly.

I'm looking at a full day of 10-15 winds tomorrow, so I'll have plenty of opportunity to look at this.
 

Joe

.
Jun 1, 2004
8,184
Catalina 27 Mission Bay, San Diego
The knotmeter versus the gps is an option when setting up the instruments.... you could always re install the device. Also, even though I'm a B&G, guy I've sometimes had conflict between the tiller pilot and the chartplotter when I switch into "sail to wind" mode. The AP software in the chartplotter and the Navico tiller pilot seem to want to compete.... weird. Most time's it works perfect... but your issue is interesting...my first thought was the wind device had slipped in to apparent wind mode, similar to my tiller pilot experience. Hey... it's probably something super simple... you'll get it sorted out.
 
Oct 26, 2008
6,259
Catalina 320 Barnegat, NJ
Not knowing what instrument models you have ... my guess is that you may have been reading apparent wind display and only thinking you were on the true wind display. I can't tell you how many times I've done something similar. (When you stopped, true wind and apparent would be the same - so of course it keeps you from seeing the display for what it might have been). I only mention this because my old RM had a button to toggle between True and Apparent and if you didn't notice which setting it was on, you could easily be led down a confusing path. Just a thought .... :cool:

I also doubt that any difference between boat speed and SOG could have been that large to explain the discrepancy.
 
May 7, 2012
1,532
Hunter e33 Maple Bay, BC
I also doubt that any difference between boat speed and SOG could have been that large to explain the discrepancy.
Scott this was taken not to far from Foswick's sailing grounds. Not through a pass or narrows where current can run much higher than the 5.4 kts experienced here.
IMG_1293.jpg
 
Oct 26, 2008
6,259
Catalina 320 Barnegat, NJ
Scott this was taken not to far from Foswick's sailing grounds. Not through a pass or narrows where current can run much higher than the 5.4 kts experienced here.
I suppose. But he said they "stopped". I don't know how you can "stop" in 5 knot current and not know that you are moving enough to significantly affect apparent wind. Also, he says they were motoring at 6.5 knots. If he was motoring against a 5 knot current, wouldn't that be something significant to add to the mystery? Who does that anyway under normal circumstances ... motoring against a 5 knot current on a sailboat? I suspect that is something to avoid. I'm assuming they were motoring in negligible current. But, of course, not knowing the habits of sailors in this location, I could be misunderstanding.

Maybe if he was reading 12-14 knots True, the most logical thing to do would be to observe the apparent wind speed and tell us what that was.
 
Apr 25, 2024
478
Fuji 32 Bellingham
The issue of discrepancy can have to do with current (as they do run swiftly here). It is possible to be moving at hull speed and traveling backward. But, more to the point, the paddle wheel that measures water speed is unreliable. Ours usually works, but something gums it up about 25% of the time.

So, I rarely even look at it. I usually just look at the water to sense how fast we're moving. It didn't occur to me to look at it to see if it was stopped when we were experiencing this phenomenon. Will be looking today ... when the winds come.
 
Jan 1, 2006
7,517
Slickcraft 26 Sailfish
I don't see how TWS can be calculated in tidal waters from SOG.
If there really is/was a 5 knot current the SOG could vary from 10 knots going with the current to 0 knots SOG going into the current. That variance is 200% of the assumed boat speed (STW) of 5 knots. Even at a current rate of 2.5 knots the range of SOG going upwind or downwind would be 100% of boat speed. How could the software account for that?
Yes paddlewheel are inaccurate. But if kept clean they are close. Even if your sense of speed is as or more accurate than the paddlewheel, how do you tell the processor what you think the boat speed is?
You could get a transducer that doesn't have a paddlewheel.
 
Jan 19, 2010
12,556
Hobie 16 & Rhodes 22 Skeeter Charleston
Assuming the issue is not current or an incorrect toggle on the display... you can check the calibration by waiting for a calm day and then comparing your GPS speed to wind speed.
 
Apr 25, 2024
478
Fuji 32 Bellingham
I don't see how TWS can be calculated in tidal waters from SOG.
You can't. I just hadn't thought about it, so just just assumed it was using GPS. If I'd thought about it a second, I would have realized.

But ...

We had a good sail today. When we started out, motoring out of our anchorage, we were moving along at about 5 kts and GPS and knotmeter agreed on this. The true wind speed indicated 5 kts. Looked up and the anemometer wasn't moving. So, spot on - that's the TWS it should have calculated.

We changed point of sail in every direction in conditions ranging from 5-20 kts. The TWS always appeared reasonable and the GPS and knotmeter were always in agreement on speed (with the expected current effects).

So, today proved nothing because I couldn't replicate the problem. But, also, the knotmeter seemed to be working fine all day. So, that hypothesis still looks strong.

I did try to disconnect it, but that was more hassle than I was willing to exert today. And, I kind of wonder if disconnecting it will just take it offline such that the plotter recognizes it is offline - like disconnected is not the same as registering zero.
 
May 17, 2004
5,619
Beneteau Oceanis 37 Havre de Grace
And, I kind of wonder if disconnecting it will just take it offline such that the plotter recognizes it is offline - like disconnected is not the same as registering zero.
Yes, probably. Simrad/B&G just shows dashes if it doesn’t have all the data needed to do a computation.