C320

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Patrick I.

I am in the process of buying a year 2001 Catalina 320. I would like to know if anyone has done any significant bluewater cruising in this boat. I am trying to get an idea as to the boat's ocean cruising capabilities. Thanks.
 
R

Ron

Not in a C320

Having just purchased one myself (hull#831), I can't answer your question directly. However, the nature of your question suggests that you probably picked the wrong boat. Every boat design is a compromise of form & function & cost. To me, the C320 is a very nice, comfortable boat designed for the day sailing and coastal cruising that most of us weekend sailors do, and the budgets we can deal with. A great value for its class of use! However, I wouldn't pick it for serious offshore use (i.e., "bluewater" cruising). While it seems rugged enough for an occasional short offshore hop in relatively good weathe/moderate seas, it doesn't appear to be designed to take the long-term stresses of long-term motions and stress conditions of bad weather encountered in passagemaking. The hull shape seems to have good form stability for its designed function; how it would fare in a knockdown, or with serious boarding waves, I don't know. Take the cockpit, for instance: it's spacious and relatively comfortable as a "salon" for socializing, but how comfortable would you feel while close hauled into heavy swells? I'm over six feet tall, and my legs can just barely reach across to brace against the opposite side. Look at the ports/hatches; can they withstand the steady pounding, flexing, etc.? I would suspect they'd leak in fairly short order. Other owners have told me that the C320 has a tendancy to bury her bow into waves. (That could be due to excess anchor/rode weight on the nose.) That isn't a feature I'd like at sea, as it will tend to amplify any problems of steering, stability, and stresses on ports/hatches/etc. Do you feel the C320 has the proper amount of water, fuel, storage, etc for offshore use? I don't. Also, you'd want better sea berths. I'd want more of a keel on a cruising/passagemaker, too. The list goes on. Reconsider your intended purpose/needs/budget, and look for a boat suited for that market niche. Just for comparison, look at a Pacific Seacraft Crealock 34, or an Island Packet 350, and compare features, design, and cost. There are many others, too. Good luck --Ron
 
C

Chris Hyland

Define Your idea of Blue Water

Patrick, My wife and I Went to the January Boat show to buy a 320. It's a great boat. A great coastal cruiser. That's what it's designed for. We ended up buying a C36 because the order process for a 320 with a fin keel was too long. I don't consider the C36 as a blue water cruiser either. Now if you intend to take it ten miles offshore to an island destination, I think you'd be fine in relatively normal seas. Take a look at Island Packet. Warning, Warning, This is the slow boat to China. Like a bradge with a mast nailed to it! They are heavy, very well built, Tankage is greater for the size of the vessel, Full Keel, and no portholes/windows in the hull / below the deck level. Best of luck, Chris
 
C

Chris Hyland

Dunking the bow

Ron may be right about the bow. If the 320 has the same anchor locker as the C36, and I think it does, I wouldn't want to punch that bow into to many waves. The anchor locker is quite large and could fill with 3 to 4 hundred pounds of seawater faster than it could drain. That would certinly nose her down in rough weather. Catalina makes a great coastal cruiser. Even the flagship models like the 47 and 50 are designed as such. Would I take our C36 to BVI if I couls ever get that much tme off? Sure, but I'd hug the coast all the way down. People do the Newport ot Bermuda race in them, but I'm not that crazy, maybe foolish is a better word.... All that being said the 320 is a sweet boat for what it's designed for. We loved it from the first time we boarded and I'll always have a place in my heart for that boat. Regards, Chris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.