Why??
RichH,You and I must see the purpose of a forum like this very differently. You are correct in what you say and if you want to use it go for it. But I feel an obligation and responsibility to give an answer that is both useful and realistic instead of just showing how clever I can be. The person who asked the question obviously doesn’t have a machine shop and he will be asking someone else to fabricate any parts for him. Why would I recommend a “non standard” more expensive metal instead of something available off the shelf that does the job and is used all the time for a good reason? You say,“The original poster asked which material is best. That answer remains (true) bronze and the best 'true' bronze is still NiAlBronze for seawater service”First, there are many true bronzes. Second, the best choice takes into account every aspect of the job. Don’t select a material based on one property of the material to the determent of other factors. And don’t select a material that solves a non existent problem. Manganese Bronze, also a true bronze, is what’s used in this case and it has been used for quite some time now so what do you gain with a more expensive solution? You want the part to last 50 years longer then the boat? You want to spend just so you can say you spent extra? I wonder why Manganese Bronze is the most common metal for struts, propellers, rudder bearings and Pintles and Gudgeons and other underwater fittings.As far as a source goes I don’t need to look it up anywhere. My supplier can handle it and I have used exotic metals and materials on a lot of jobs where it made sense. Some racing boats have very fancy and expensive fittings but that’s not what’s needed in this case.Again, I am in the marine industry not the Chemical Processing business. If Admiralty Bronze is a term you find in common use in the chemical business then that’s great. But in the American marine business it’s not a term you hear unless you are on the phone with an English company. All the best,Robert Gainer