Boom Furling: First impression - Great!
This spring I bought a Schaefer Gamma Boom Furling System and had my rigger install it. I have been out sailing with it on about 8 days. For a variety of reasons I have had a very slow start to my sailing season.
There is a learning curve. At this point I think I know all of the right stuff to do, but I just need to remember not to skip a step. Regardless, at this point the system is meeting all of my expectations.
Before choosing the Schaefer system, I also looked at the Leisure Furl system. I read the Practical Sailor evaluations of a variety of systems that was published in Feb 2011. I looked at the Leisure Furl system at the Newport Boat show last fall, and I went to the Schaefer factory (about 30 miles from my sailboat) and looked at their system. My rigger has installed about 10 Schaefer systems and 100 Leisure Furl systems. Leisure Furl has been around since the early 90's (I think) and Schaefer since abut 2006. My rigger liked the Leisure Furl but I decided upon the Schaefer. I believe that both of these systems are good and that anyone would be happy with either one.
However, I felt that the Schaefer had some distinct advantages vs the Leisure Furl. Probably the most significant feature of the Schaefer is that it uses an articulating track that is attached to the mast. This track rotates with the boom and is constantly aligned with the boom and sail. This means that the sail always rises straight up from the boom into the track even if the boom is swung out 90 degrees. The Leisure furl uses a fixed track so that the sail must rotate from the boom into the track unless the boom is centered. The Schaefer track is designed to separate the batten driving load from the luff tape so that the sail can be raised or furled with some wind load on it. Leisure Furl had issues with high wear on luff tapes and these issues are presumed to be corrected.
Another major difference between the Schaefer and LF is the location of the furling drum. Schaefer places it at the outboard end of the boom and runs the furling line inside the boom and back to the cockpit. LF puts the drum on the front of the mast and then drives the mandrel that the sail rolls onto by a 1" shaft with a universal joint that runs through the mast. The logic of that design totally escapes me, but with over 300 systems in the field, it is a proven design. I just didn't care for it.
The Schaefer system uses a fixed vang to hold the boom at precisely the optimum angle to the mast. LF uses a solid vang, but it needs to be adjusted to the correct angle before use.
Both systems feature a sail cover that slides into the opening in the boom. The LF appears to be an easier implementation than the Schaefer, but I can remove my Schaefer cover in under 1 minute and install it in under 3 minutes.
Now to answer the real question that the OP asked. Raising and furling the sail is a breeze. It does require an electric winch for the easiest operation. The sail can be reefed at any batten location. That is to say that the sail is furled until a batten is just on the mandrel. The batten helps to hold the foot of the sail tight and flat. So far I have raised and furled my sail 10x or more. I have put in one reef but I did that at the beginning of my sail for the day. Nevertheless it was simple.
I have lots of pictures of the Schaefer system and I can share these and more details of operation.
One advantage of the boom furlers over the mast systems is that if the furling mechanism ever jams, the sail can be dropped like a conventional sail to the deck. With a mast system you may have a disaster with a sail that cannot be moved in or out.