Sorry, I did not phrase the question with sufficient detail...
as a vane user and auto user with a couple of decades of playing with most of them, i have a distinct preference for the hydrovane. I am more concerned with the installation of otto in the specific of a H40, with the less than watertight lazarette, funky space access, somewhat delicate helm pedestal, somewhat lively response. small electrical system, light to medium weight boat...... etc......
the limitiations of that physical configuration are what I am mostly interested in. Someone who has actually measured the power consumption of the raymarine for example in their typical cruising grounds. I am not looking for specific motoring performance, put power needs are a consideration, and recent installers and users impressions to see if they note things that are more important to them than say what I have found. I tend to lean to RayMarine when motoring. but I am not beholden to them. (tho the 2 button tacking is convenient upwind. It would be interesting to measure power used by 2 or more simlar weight boats to see how they compare to others when sailing.
all of them can move the boat when motoring in fair conditions...... but the garmin I have noticed (even tho it has excellent displays) does not seem to hold trim as well, wind info did not noticeably improve tracking, and motor/drive configuration seems a little weaker.
anyway, with the multiple quadrant connection configurations, I was curious what others found to be easiest to install and most robust of the ottos......inside the hunter.
Thanks, I will phrase the question more accurately next time.