Hey Shooter, I like your post
but not because I agree. I don't, at least not entirely. I do like that you're speaking your mind.
I'm going to respond to your comments though. We can discuss it further over some cold ones.
I disagree with the others.
Cool.
Anything that makes my day easier, I'm for.
Isn't that what Sea Rays are for?
I don't go sailing to go fast. I borrow my brother's Sea Ray 23 for that.
Oops, sorry.
I go out on the boat and water for selfish spiritual reasons.
I'd suggest that sailing poorly probably isn't terribly spiritual.
I have met a lot of people with in-mast furlers who love them.
He's not asking about an in-mast furler but even those don't address the shape issues.
Behind the mast is the only retrofit that makes economic sense.
Oh my. It's more expensive than lazy-jacks so that can't be true.
I didn't take up sailing to exercise or test myself or anything like that.
You took up sailing to sail, right?
If you want it, get it if you can, but let me know what you got and how you like it.
Absolutely.
I would presume the naysayers have no experience with it. Just a guess.
In my case you guessed right.
For me, sailing well is usually intense. Doing it well is a kind of religious experience. I want my boat to perform. I think rolling mains take a hit in performance. If there were any performance to be gained then the racers would be doing it. And they aren't.
I do understand why many people like them. I'm sure they can be optimized.
I've read the opinion about how, 'I'm not going to be racing.' I'll just say that performance means many things. It's not just about knots or degrees of heel. For example, I'd find it tough to give up the simplicity of releasing the halyard and dousing the sail unattended in seconds while shorthanded in heinous conditions.
I don't mind some effort when I sail, I do confess to having a dodger though . . .