The problem with heeling a modern wide beam hull
is that the foil on a wide beam boat is a thick foil compared to traditional narrower beam boats. Thicker foils generate more lift. The foil described is not the keel or rudder foil, but the foil made by the hull chines which become asymmetrical with heeling. When flat, that thick foil of modern cruisers of course is symmetrical and offers no lift, but when heeled it becomes asymmetrical and starts generating lots of lift and unfortunately its to leeward.This is true because the differential of flow is greater for a thicker foil and generates a greater pressure differential. And, the greater the heeling, the greater the asymmetry and the more leeward lift. Compounding the problem is usually the wide beam has a flatter bottom and less rocker so that the asymmetry of heeling is even more pronounced. The big curved chine of the leeward hull compared to the flattish low rocker bottom means lots of asymmetry. And, if the center of this leeward lift of the asymmetrical heeled hull doesn't correspond with the CLR, then it also fouls up boat balance and induces helm, usually weather, sometimes enough to round some designs up when they heel too far.While there are new designs that actually produce windward lift with heeling (less hull curvature and more rocker, made possible by deep bulb keels, our cruisers ain't them and we are better off with reasonably small amounts of heeling to avoid the leeward lift. Leeway forces of the sailplan are bad enough but when the hull starts lifting to leeward things get outa hand, then leeway becomes great enough to have the keel and rudder tripping up the boat which really adds heeling and things have gone very sour...