S
Steve
Have a two year old Catalina which received dealer installed barier coat and bottom paint prior to new delivery. When pulling boat last fall (after second season of sailing) bottom was covered with blisters which dealer claimed were caused by water collecting between the barrier coat and gel coat (result of poor paint adhesion). Boat bottom was soda blasted this Spring to remove all paint and discovered that bottom is now dimpled like a golf ball. Most dimples are 1/4 inch diameter and 1/16-1/8 inch deep. Some of the dimples are larger (size of a quarter) and are much deeper, approaching the surface of the fiberglass hull. Soda Blaster says there is a problem with the gel coat and dealer says there was a problem with the soda blaster. From my perspective the dimples are consistent in size and location to the blisters which were noted last fall. Dealer wants to sand the dimples and fill the few that are especially deep and follow up with bottom paint only. No barrier coat this time.... Is this a reasonble procedure? Should something other than sanding be accomplished? Will I have a high likelyhood of future gel coat blsiters? Question for legal experts reading this... Since I have a large investment with significant problems NOT caused by me do I have grounds for legal recourse? There was no specific warranty tied to the dealer installed barrier coat and bottom paint application. I sure would appreciate some "unbiased" expert advise! THANKS!!!!