Who Knows?
All the specs I've seen list the 33's ballast as 4600 pounds, both for the shoal and deep fin keels. At this point who knows. No one at Hunter does, I assure you. Whatever it is, they burnt the prints years ago. Does it matter? I don't think so. The boat will round up long before capsize becomes a problem. Besides, you're not likely to have a 33 out on the open ocean for any great voyages. Coastal cruiser? Absolutely! Ocean voyager? Only for a select few. Use it for what it was intended and you'll be ecstatic with it.If you're in an area with lots of water (like Long Island Sound)and figure on never going into an area with shallower water, go for the deeper keel. If you're like me and sail in an area where 6 feet of water is cause for celebration go for the shoal version. The difference is a bit (well, maybe more than a little bit) of pointing ability.Weak points? Nowhere near what the later boats have to offer in manufacturing and engineering goofs. Delamination of the hull appears to be rare. Ports and attendant leakage and core rot are a joke. Upper decks leak and rot where installations are done improperly. The compression post doesn't make problems. The rudder is too small. Rudder support tube nut rots away and Hunter has no replacement available. Chain plates are prone to leaking and therefore rotting of the core there, and require constant vigilance. Some complain of weak cockpit soles. Most likely caused by water entering the core via the fuel fill instalation. Uncaring glass work; sloppy but not dangerous that I've seen. My experience indicates a sturdy boat, quicker than most, that will accept loads of owner stupidity.Genoa track? Yes, I added them. 11 footers on both sides. Wasn't sure what I would end up with for sails. About 68, 1 1/4" holes in the side decks, filled with thickened epoxy. No problems with the strength or application of the installation. Probably worth the effort.My opinion? Where else are you going to get 33 feet of boat for the kind of money you're looking at?