Best answer EVER!theres the lesson here folks. thread is over....the answer is that if someone anchors too close for your buffer zone tastes then you should get over it by politely sh***ng in their cockpit.
Thank you. It was very close esp since his anchor was undersized & his boat was draggiing.This is very close if this is Pelican Bay. I have counted over 100 boats in here on Memorial Day weekend. The attached picture will give you an idea of what half of the bay looks like.
The admiralty law case reference that requires a boater to alert his/her new neighbor if the latter’s anchorage will either interfere with the swinging room of the first to arrive or the first boat’s ability to safely maneuver out of the anchorage.Are some boaters stupid or inconsiderate? This guy came roaring into the anchorage & anchored on top of us. The red ball is our anchor float.
Thanks for this; I've tried to make productive use of the information a couple of times recently but with mixed results. Apparently, some skippers have concluded that they have a "right" to crowd into an anchorage even when they cannot fit into a spot where the above Admiralty decision could be respected, even when so informed. Best example--holiday weekends where there are many boats wishing to anchor in a space-restricted anchorage. I encounter this culture attitude fairly often, which is evidently based on the "share and share alike" philosophy, if you wish to call it a philosophy. Actually, it is but an admonishment toward children together in a play box along with their toys. I'm astonished that skippers (men) in their 60's can rationally believe that a boat lying at anchor on a single hook since mid-week can be expected to re-anchor or to moor itself (bow-stern anchor) to "make room" for a small fleet of yachts cruising together for that weekend, or else risk collision from a lack of adequate swinging room imposed on him by the newcomer(s). If the guy does not comply he can be hit with spiteful commentsThe admiralty law case reference that requires a boater to alert his/her new neighbor if the latter’s anchorage will either interfere with the swinging room of the first to arrive or the first boat’s ability to safely maneuver out of the anchorage.
The U.S. Admiralty Court, in the Juniata decision (no. 124-5861), found that “A Vessel shall be found at fault if it…anchors so close to another vessel as to foul her when swinging, or if it fails to shift anchorage when dragging dangerously close to another anchored vessel. Furthermore, the vessel that anchored first shall warn the one who anchored last that the berth chosen will foul the former’s berth”. This case appears to create an affirmative duty on the part of the first boat in an anchorage to inform a newcomer if swinging room or a safe exit route is impaired.
From "Capable Cruiser 3rd Edition [Kindle Edition]" by Lin and Larry Pardey.