OK, a bit of googling and I found it in a different 618 manual. This "Sen" parameter seems new to the 618. If turned on, it will change the alternator output if one of the sensors fails (or for this argument, is missing). If the alt temp sensor fails, it drops the field output to 50%. If the battery sensor is missing, it drops the field output to 12%.
I assume the 618 must handle alternator temperature differently than the 614? The 614 summarily drops the field to 50% if the sensor is over the set limit, and goes full field again when the temp drops below the set limit. It is pretty dumb at this, and usually results in the alternator output yo-yo'ing up and down every 10min or so. Does the 618 handle this with more precision if the "sen" parameter is on, by ramping down until it finds a place where the alt stays below the limit continuously? Balmar is so bad at documenting these behaviors.
The 614 controlling a hot alternator overall gives an average output somewhere between 50-100%, but is a silly way of achieving that. Ramping down to find a continuous output that keeps the temp below setpoint would be a nicer way. Overall, though, I think the average output between the two would be about the same.
I guess the "sen" function is good in letting you know if a sensor has failed regardless. Too bad it can't do this for them individually.
Mark