Now if someone could actually answer the original ?? What IS the best RPM to idle the engine for battery charging ???
Brian
Brian,
There is no one easy answer for that.
You need to be able to see amps in at a specific state of charge to know which RPM is best for your alternator and engine/pulley ratio. A digital clamp on, DC, digital volt meter will tell you the amp output at a given RPM.
It would be best to do this, with the clamp on DVM, at or close to 50% state of charge so the acceptance was not the limiting factor. Perhaps you could borrow a DC clamp on DVM.
At 80% state of charge or higher, depending upon the bank size and alternator size, you may never be able to put in any more than what the alt could deliver at idle anyway because of the low acceptance of the batteries. Running it at a higher RPM would be wasteful and also apply a very minimal load to the motor which we know is not necessarily the best practice.
Trying to charge your batteries back above 80-85% state of charge with an alternator is painfully time consuming and slow and not very good for the engine.
Getting from a 50% state of charge back to 80% is what most cruisers look to do and is quite doable with an alternator.
To put in lots of amps, at say a 50% state of charge, at idle, with most factory alts, will not supply the full amperage into the typical house bank. For example, a Leece Neville 72 amp alt with internal regulator, the standard upgraded alternator on a Universal M-25, will put out about 27 +/- amps at 1000 engine RPM that is considering a 2.5:1 pulley ratio and a alternator shaft speed of 3000 RPM.
If you have a small 100 Ah battery at 50% SOC 27 amps is likely more than it can even accept, but if you have a 300 Ah bank it could accept a lot more than you are actually feeding it.
As I said not an easy answer. We do know that idling does not help your engine though and we also know how expensive re-builds are.
I find it interesting that people condemn a $195.00 battery monitor as costing them money, the whole boat costs you money.

I have found that a good monitor tends to actually save people money, though over the longer haul, by preventing a needless upgrade or making batteries that used to last 2 years now last six or seven.
I run a 50 amp stock alternator on my boat because I know that with my solar panel and light consumption/use I rarely if ever dip below a 70% state of charge. My alternator is rarely even required to put out even close to its rated amps. Without a monitor I surely would have upgrade to a big ole alternator $$..