22' verse 23' weight

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

John

Are the displacement specs = to boat weight? If so why is the h22 3200# with 1300# ballast and the h23 2450# with 800# ballast. The sail area, beam and length are close why so much more ballast in the h22? Thanks.
 
P

Pete

weight vs. displacement

weight and displacement are not the same thing! Weight is the total pounds of the boat(with with gear, etc) Displacement is the weight of the water that the boat displaces when in the water. Most of the time actual weight and displacement weight are very close but not always.I would guess that the ballast needed is a relection of the hull design and how it performs under sail.(think round vs deep v style)
 
D

David Foster

Evolution of design

Here are design parameters for the Hunter offer in the 21-23 foot range from 1981 through 1997: Boat 22 23 23.5 Years Produced 81-85 85-92 93-97 Displ./Length 260 162 153 Sail Area/Displ. 16.2 20.7 19.5 Capsize Screen 2.15 2.37 2.30 Ballast/Displ. 40.6% 32.6% 33.0% The 22 looks like a "pocket cruiser". Medium Displacement/Length, and 40% ballast will give a steadier ride, with the ballast the key stability factor. Sail Area/Displacement of 16.2 is in the average cruiser range. The boat will not accelerate rapidly in a puff, and will seldom surf down waves. In 1985, the move was to a 23 foot mover. Everything says lighter, and faster. The hull shape is probably flatter, giving good form stability to carry lots of sail. The capsize ratio confirms this - once turned over, this design would be slow to recover on its own. This looks like a fun boat to race, and would be bumpier riding the waves, and more responsive to a puff. The 23.5 of '93 refines the design of the 22. More waterline raises the hull speed to 6.2 knots, while the hull shape gives a little better capsize screen. The Sail Area/Displacement of 19.5 reduces acceleration. In summary, the earlier 22 would be a good, low cost way for a couple or single-hander to get into cruising in protected, coastal waters. The later designs would be for a racer who likes some more performance and doesn't mind a bumpy ride. David Lady Lillie '77 h27 (Definitely a cruiser)
 
P

Peter

H22 vs H23

The H22 is definitely more of a pocket cruiser than the H23. It has more headroom than the H23, more stowage room below and a deeper cockpit. The boat has a very solid feel. The H23 is more performance oriented. It has less ballast and the wing keel reduces ballast even more. It carries more sail and the rig is much more adjustable. Beam is carried further aft and the hull is almost flat aft of the keel. These characteristics allow the H23 to plane under the right conditions. There were reports of boatspeeds in excess of 10 knots in Texas. My personal best is 8.6 kts, with the stock main and 110 jib. Peter H23 "Raven"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.