Evolution of design
Here are design parameters for the Hunter offer in the 21-23 foot range from 1981 through 1997:Boat 22 23 23.5Years Produced 81-85 85-92 93-97Displ./Length 260 162 153Sail Area/Displ. 16.2 20.7 19.5Capsize Screen 2.15 2.37 2.30Ballast/Displ. 40.6% 32.6% 33.0%The 22 looks like a "pocket cruiser". Medium Displacement/Length, and 40% ballast will give a steadier ride, with the ballast the key stability factor. Sail Area/Displacement of 16.2 is in the average cruiser range. The boat will not accelerate rapidly in a puff, and will seldom surf down waves.In 1985, the move was to a 23 foot mover. Everything says lighter, and faster. The hull shape is probably flatter, giving good form stability to carry lots of sail. The capsize ratio confirms this - once turned over, this design would be slow to recover on its own. This looks like a fun boat to race, and would be bumpier riding the waves, and more responsive to a puff. The 23.5 of '93 refines the design of the 22. More waterline raises the hull speed to 6.2 knots, while the hull shape gives a little better capsize screen. The Sail Area/Displacement of 19.5 reduces acceleration.In summary, the earlier 22 would be a good, low cost way for a couple or single-hander to get into cruising in protected, coastal waters. The later designs would be for a racer who likes some more performance and doesn't mind a bumpy ride.DavidLady Lillie'77 h27(Definitely a cruiser)