What does that have to do with anything? It's also consistent with my AAA dues, but so what?The fee is consistent with what I pay for USCG Documentation each year and consistent with annualized registration fee I pay NY each year.
What does that have to do with anything? It's also consistent with my AAA dues, but so what?The fee is consistent with what I pay for USCG Documentation each year and consistent with annualized registration fee I pay NY each year.
Hey, you're the one who complained that it was just another tax. How do you think we pay for government services? Through the good graces of the people who provide those services for free?What does that have to do with anything? It's also consistent with my AAA dues, but so what?
Same to you!If you want to rant about taxes take your comments to a political forum not a sailing forum.
The reasoning for this wording probably lies deep within some international agreement on the use of the airwaves.The US (FCC) states that US boats have to have a ship's license to travel internationally. Canada has similar language and rules for its citizens who travel internationally.
Of all the things that might be checked on a boat entering a foreign country, a radio license is probably low on the list. For $23 a year I'd rather avoid any questions or discussions when entering Canada about why I don't have a license. And, if something went wrong, that's one less thing a foreign government can throw at me.So who checks? I have no idea (and I've never been checked).
Some time back, the FCC and the USCG realized that VHF radios on boats were a good thing, in particular for safety. They also realized that VHF was line of sight and that the vast majority of boaters in the US never leave US waters, nor would their signal interfere with any other country's sovereignty over their own airwaves. As a result the requirement for a station license and radio operator's license for marine VHF radios was dropped to remove a barrier to boaters adopting it.I looked into the US v. international MMSI thing a couple of years ago, but can't recall what I learned. It seems stupid that there are different databases.
Thanks, Dave, good explanation.Some time back, the FCC and the USCG realized that VHF radios on boats were a good thing, in particular for safety. They also realized that VHF was line of sight and that the vast majority of boaters in the US never leave US waters, nor would their signal interfere with any other country's sovereignty over their own airwaves. As a result the requirement for a station license and radio operator's license for marine VHF radios was dropped to remove a barrier to boaters adopting it.
When AIS came along it was initially for safety and traffic control of large commercial ships. Eventually the technology became available and affordable for recreational boaters. Again, the USCG and FCC realized the value of recreational (Class B) AIS and wanted to remove barriers to its adoption for those boaters that will never leave US waters. To facilitate its adoption, Boat/US (and I think another group) agreed to provide a free separate US based MMSI database thereby removing an obstacle. Keeping the databases separate avoids treaty and international agreement issues, for example, why do US boaters get a free MMSI while Bahamian boaters have to pay for one? (or some other country's boaters)
The US and Canada are fairly unique in that many of the recreational boaters will never come close to crossing an international boundary and both recognize the value of recreational VHF and AIS usage. Both countries have abandoned the license requirement for VHF and AIS use within their respective countries. However, since both countries respect other countries sovereignty over the airwaves and international agreements, both require licenses for their citizens traveling internationally. The associated fees cover the administrative costs of the licenses.
I think that you are pretty close to correct here, but I believe that there is a minor detail that you may be oversimplifying (perhaps intentionally). I don't believe that the requirement for a station license was completely dropped here in the US. I think that the commercial guys & land stations are still required to have them. I believe that the FCC decided that all recreational boats would be "licensed by rule" rather than by individual station licenses. Therefore recreational boaters no longer need to apply for an individual station license to use a VHF....the requirement for a station license and radio operator's license for marine VHF radios was dropped ...
If you stay in US waters on a recreational boat, then there is no need to get a station license for making voice calls on a VHF. If you do not get a MMSI, then your DSC doesn't work.What would happen if you just didn't get the license?
Yes, I was speaking of recreational boats. I forget the exact term, however, some boats are required to have a VHF and some are required to have AIS (Class A).I think that you are pretty close to correct here, but I believe that there is a minor detail that you may be oversimplifying (perhaps intentionally). I don't believe that the requirement for a station license was completely dropped here in the US. I think that the commercial guys & land stations are still required to have them.
Applying for the Ship's Station License and Restricted Radio Operator's license can be done on line and it only takes a little longer than the time to clear the credit card number. The licenses are then downloaded as a PDF. A great improvement over the past. Ship's Station Licenses are issued to the vessel owner and the boat together. If the vessel is sold the previous owner must cancel the license and the new owner must relicense the boat. The same is true for a BoatUS MMSI number. Not sure how hard it is to change something simple like an address.There are a few down sides to the FCC number though. The FCC charges a fee & it used to take a while to get you your paperwork. Once you have the FCC number, the information associated with it can't be edited easily (if at all).
I should have noted that the US and Canada no longer require licenses for their citizens operating marine radios within their respective countries. US citizens need licenses to operate radios in Canada and vice-versa.Both countries have abandoned the license requirement for VHF and AIS use within their respective countries.
I have gone into my Boat US MMSI profile & changed the vessel name and type when I moved a radio from one boat to another. I have not yet tried to change the name on the Boat US MMSI. I was not able to change the MMSI number that had been entered into the radio. Putting an MMSI number into my radio was a one shot deal. I am told that if the radio is returned to the factory, the number can be reset there.... If the vessel is sold the previous owner must cancel the license and the new owner must relicense the boat. The same is true for a BoatUS MMSI number. Not sure how hard it is to change something simple like an address....
Just to clarify:I should have noted that the US and Canada no longer require licenses for their citizens operating marine radios within their respective countries. US citizens need licenses to operate radios in Canada and vice-versa.
I too make beer... and actually save money doing so. I have to look for Harpoon IPA. Although I don't know of a BJ's Wholesale Club anywhere. Oh, all east coast.Beer snob!
But seriously: Harpoon IPA, 24 bottle loose case, $21 at BJ's Wholesale Club. I like good beer, too, and I make beer, and I think Harpoon is pretty good!
I bet that the cellular services providers would beg to differ after paying high millions (small billions?) for the right to use the spectrum.Cell phone spectrum has pretty much been granted worldwide licence-free use status.
you don't have to take the course; just take an exam. The exam fee is not that high, $35?/?From what I know Canadians must take a week long course, do a written test then pay for a license. I don't imagine they are giving away a week long course either.