A Sad Christmas Day

Status
Not open for further replies.

Les

.
May 8, 2004
375
Hunter 27 Bellingham, WA
Hello All Stations...

Something happened on Christmas Day that is still bothering me. My wife and i live on South Hill overlooking Bellingham Bay in the Pacific Northwest, close to the Canadian border. We have good binoculars and a spotting scope to keep tabs on what happens in the bay--who is coming and who is leaving. Normally it is a fun hobby.

However, yesterday afternoon we both saw a small (30 feet?) sailboat that looked like it was dragging its anchor. We had a strong wind storm that morning and it was still blowing up to gusts of thirty or so knots. White caps in the bay. Wind direction was broadly south to southwest.

It appears that the sailboat had gotten its anchor hooked under the keel and was broadside to the prevailing wind sawing its way back and fourth. This has happened to me once before. It was clearly dragging and had probably been anchored off Boulevard Park which is on the east side of the bay and lies under a group of condos. There were white caps in the bay.

Both Lynn and I agreed it was dragging so I called 911. I told them what was happening to the boat and they immediately connected me to the Coast Guard Station in Bellingham. After five rings CG Bellingham answered. [an aside: why do military units (not just the Coast Guard) answer the phone in such clipped voices and speak so fast ?] I told them there was a sailboat dragging its anchor and would either hit the freighter that is docked or hit the Georgia-Pacific breakwater. The person answering said they had already had several calls about the boat but he could not give anymore information at that time.

The Bellingham Coast Guard station is probably less then a quarter mile from these two sites. They have a number (I've counted five at one time) of forty foot inflatables with three Honda outboards in the stern at the ready. It would have taken less then two minutes after boarding their boat to reach the scene. Twenty minutes later the small sailboat hit the breakwater and started pounding on the rocks. At that time I called 911 and asked for Coast Guard once again. A female voice answered--I told them the boat was pounding on the rocks and someone needed to get it off. She told me there were readying a crew as we spoke.

I never saw a Coast Guard Crew approach the small boat during the next hour however, it was now getting dark. Perhaps they came out and decided they couldn't do the job. I really don't know. Since then, I've talked to a retired Coast Guard chief and he told me the CG mission has changed and they don't save boats anymore. Pity.

What ticks me off is the lack of concern that I got with the two phone calls to the CG station. It almost sounded like boredom.

But I am ticked with myself as well, perhaps even more. Had I know that the Coast Guard wasn't going out to save the boat or they felt it was too rough or for whatever reason I wish they had told me on the first phone call. I would have found someone to help me and taken my boat out. It wasn't that bad and I could have backed up to it before it hit the rocks, put a line aboard and cut the anchor line (assuming it wasn't all chain) and towed it into the harbor.

Damn, but it is sad to see today the mast sticking out of the water by the breakwater. The sailboat is now at the bottom of Bellingham Bay against the breakwater. This incident didn't need to happen.

I am now going to lobby the Port of Bellingham that we now have a Vessel Assist (BoatUS) in our harbor. I don't trust the Coast Guard anymore. But perhaps I don't know the whole story either.

A sad, sad day in northwest boating.

Les

Les Blackwell
CG license (I'm embarrassed to say)
H27, Trumpeter
 
May 4, 2005
4,062
Macgregor 26d Ft Lauderdale, Fl
if you had said, you thought someone was aboard, and must be hurt, they would have responded.

just saying...
 
Oct 2, 2006
1,517
Jboat J24 commack
If there is no life in danger it has been left to Commercial Salvors who cover Ch16 like HAWKS

Around here with thousands of moored boats sadly breaking free is pretty much and everyday thing on the LIS north and south shore
 
Feb 26, 2004
23,360
Catalina 34 224 Maple Bay, BC, Canada
...Since then, I've talked to a retired Coast Guard chief and he told me the CG mission has changed and they don't save boats anymore. Pity.

...What ticks me off is the lack of concern that I got with the two phone calls to the CG station. It almost sounded like boredom.

...I know that the Coast Guard wasn't going out to save the boat or they felt it was too rough or for whatever reason I wish they had told me on the first phone call.

...I would have found someone to help me and taken my boat out. It wasn't that bad and I could have backed up to it before it hit the rocks, put a line aboard and cut the anchor line (assuming it wasn't all chain) and towed it into the harbor.

...Damn, but it is sad to see today the mast sticking out of the water by the breakwater. The sailboat is now at the bottom of Bellingham Bay against the breakwater. This incident didn't need to happen.

...I am now going to lobby the Port of Bellingham that we now have a Vessel Assist (BoatUS) in our harbor. I don't trust the Coast Guard anymore. But perhaps I don't know the whole story either.
Les,

Once the CG became part of the DHS their mission changed. This happened about a decade ago, quite enough time for you to be made aware of it, I think. Nothing personal, but I guess "common knowledge" isn't as common as I may have thought. It should have been their responsibility, though, to tell you that unless "life & limb" are threatened, they no longer save "just boats." If there was no one on the boat, they will do nothing. Nothing. They should have told you at least that.

It would have been foolhardy of you to make that attempt, as well-meaning as I know you meant it to be. Your safety is your responsibility. Hopping on a dragging boat in 30 knot winds sounds pretty dangerous to me.

"Didn't need to happen" could well be directed at the skipper of the dragging boat, not the CG. It is sad to see any boat go up on the rocks.

I'm not quite sure that lobbying the Port will do you any good. Vessel Assist and TowBoatUS are private firms. I don't know what you'd have to do to get these private firms to provide a rescue boat in your harbor. You might want to do some more research on that before you contact the Port.

Sad story, yes, and well reported by you, but that's the reality of the role of the CG these days. Sorry to have to pass the news on to you. We monitor Ch. 16 traffic all the time, of course, and hear repeated CG distress calls, and repeatedly hear from the CG that if no people are in danger, then the skipper should call Vessel Assist. That's simply how it is.

Stu
 
Nov 8, 2010
11,386
Beneteau First 36.7 & 260 Minneapolis MN & Bayfield WI
if you had said, you thought someone was aboard, and must be hurt, they would have responded.

just saying...
I'm thinking this is a BAD idea. The coasties risk their lives every time they go out. That's their job and what they signed up for when people's lives are at risk. But to save someone not present an insurance claim, nope.
 

Les

.
May 8, 2004
375
Hunter 27 Bellingham, WA
While I agree with Stu (I might have said I think the boat is loaded with drugs) I also agree with Jackdaw that getting the Coast Guard to come out might have put lives at risk, HOWEVER, I'm still upset with myself for not getting a crew and going after the drifting boat myself. I live five to ten minutes from the harbor and my little boat is ready to go. It has a Max prop so I can back up with the same control as when I go forward. It wouldn't have been that big of deal. Why I didn't go I don't know. I'm mad at myself.

And yes Stu, the mission did change some years back but I still have troubles getting my mind around the fact that the Coast Guard is not available anymore except in life saving cases. Somehow, something doesn't compute with me in this instance. The Coast Guard Station is two minutes away, the coasties have to be on duty, they could have come out, saved the boat and been back at their base in less then forty minutes. And would have felt good about doing a good deed. Something just doesn't feel right.
 
Jan 1, 2006
8,011
Slickcraft 26 Sailfish
I guess the environmental damage from the spill of 20 gallons of fuel doesn't qualify as enough of a reason to keep the boat from sinking Isn't there a Harbormaster? Why didn't the commercial salvage companies step in?
 
Sep 25, 2008
1,096
CS 30 Toronto
Actually your insurance would not cover you, your boat, or any damage to that boat. Good Samaritan law only apply to human life. You cannot proof that you did not caused the boat to drag anchor. Sad society but that's what we live in.
 
Jun 12, 2010
936
Oday 22 Orleans Marina, NOLA
Actually your insurance would not cover you, your boat, or any damage to that boat. Good Samaritan law only apply to human life. You cannot proof that you did not caused the boat to drag anchor. Sad society but that's what we live in.
That was my thought. If you had rescued the boat and there was some damage, or even no damage, the boat owner could get a lawyer and sue.

Bottom line it's the owners responsibility, not yours. I also can't blame the CG for not risking lives just to save property.

Maybe we should put up a sign on our boats when leaving it, saying 'Please save my boat if it's in trouble - I promise not to sue!" Or start a 'No sue Boat Club' with a special sticker that other members recognize...
 

Rick D

.
Jun 14, 2008
7,204
Hunter Legend 40.5 Shoreline Marina Long Beach CA
That's Annoying

The CG has a zillion dollars of equipment that WE have purchased and plenty of personnel needing training. To simply do nothing is an affront to all the rest of us and is arrogance, mission be damned. Les, write a letter to your local paper and another to the local commander. For crying out loud, even poor third world coast guards / navys would try to do something. This is an embarrassment.
 
Jun 3, 2004
298
'79 Hunter 33' HUN33190M79L Olympia
A couple years ago my boat broke loose. I got a phone call from the wife of my friend who lives there (I live five hours away). I frantically called every rescue place and finally got ahold of a guy. He called me back about half an hour later. Another neighbor, a retired colonel, saw the boat broken loose, got in his row boat and chased it down in the tide about half a mile away. He then flagged down a passing boat and got them to tow it back to his buoy. The guy I called met these people bringing my boat back for me.
 
Nov 8, 2010
11,386
Beneteau First 36.7 & 260 Minneapolis MN & Bayfield WI
The CG has a zillion dollars of equipment that WE have purchased and plenty of personnel needing training. To simply do nothing is an affront to all the rest of us and is arrogance, mission be damned. Les, write a letter to your local paper and another to the local commander. For crying out loud, even poor third world coast guards / navys would try to do something. This is an embarrassment.
Wow. Really? Can you back any of this up?

The CG has a zillion dollars of equipment that WE have purchased -- A ZILLON?? And last I head, most CG stations were understaffed.

Plenty of personnel needing training. -- Since when does an unplanned, unscoped boat salvage mission quality as a training mission?

Even poor third world coast guards / navys would try to do something. -- List please.

I don't know about you, but I sail in a place were the Coasties get TONS of respect. And they have their hands full. And every one of them would risk their life to save my sorry butt, even if I was totally at fault. I personally don't think they deserve this type of abuse.
 
May 26, 2009
46
Oday 28 West Vancouver
I don't know much about U.S. Coast Guard policy, but the impoverished Canadian Coast Guard's first response is to send out a general call to any mariners who may be able to assist. Usually the commercial operators would answer pretty quickly. If there is no danger to any persons, it may be a straight salvage job, with internationally agreed terms of responsibility and remuneration. It is surely in everyone's interest to prevent the sinking of a vessel.

I often hear resentment towards commercial operators from boaters who think they should have a free rescue/tow (including running out of fuel), but I think they provide a valuable service. If you don't want it, don't take it.

Obviously, a boat owner could deny that his unattended boat was in danger and refuse to pay (or worse!) and it would be up to the salvager to obtain evidence to cover himself.

Once a boat has sunk, with the accompanying risk of pollution and hazard to navigation,
it is often a much more complicated issue, and I don't think we should take the attitude that if there is no endangerment to human life then it is only the owner's problem.
 
May 4, 2005
4,062
Macgregor 26d Ft Lauderdale, Fl
I can't disagree with the new mission statement.

limited resources. new priorities, -fuel ain't cheap... And they are competing with private businesses, when its just money at risk....

-caveat emptor.
 

Rick D

.
Jun 14, 2008
7,204
Hunter Legend 40.5 Shoreline Marina Long Beach CA
Wow. Really? Can you back any of this up?

The CG has a zillion dollars of equipment that WE have purchased -- A ZILLON?? And last I head, most CG stations were understaffed.

Plenty of personnel needing training. -- Since when does an unplanned, unscoped boat salvage mission quality as a training mission?

Even poor third world coast guards / navys would try to do something. -- List please.

I don't know about you, but I sail in a place were the Coasties get TONS of respect. And they have their hands full. And every one of them would risk their life to save my sorry butt, even if I was totally at fault. I personally don't think they deserve this type of abuse.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. I know in Long Beach and San Diego, we have new cutters, a slug of new patrol craft and expanded staffing. That may not be the same for every area. Frankly, if their mission is changed so radically, we ought to just fold them into the USN and be done with them.

BTW, I have a lot of respect for the CG. Further, they are responsive and cooperative in my sailing area. Even if they offload property protection, they coordinate it and monitor it and I know they have responded at times.

But, there is simply no excuse for this behavior as described by Les. And, yes, I would expect Mexico, El Savador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Costa Rica and Columbia to assist if they could.
 

LloydB

.
Jan 15, 2006
927
Macgregor 22 Silverton
Why not report the derelict to the agency that will take the report of a stolen boat from the owner or a missing person report from their relatives? I'm still trying to figure out how it is that the posters here and the AHJ there know that there is no one still in the boat.
 
Oct 2, 2006
1,517
Jboat J24 commack
You have no IDEA the can of worms this is :)

As I said earlier today with so many moorings breaking lose is common around here and it does not always end well for the salvor or who ever helps out

For example a late model hunter 26 broke lose next to me this year and went up on the beach with what looked like no dammage so the mooring company fetched it off the beach at high tide and placed back on the repaired mooring

Now this sounds great BUT with the owner god knows were and not wanting to cut off the cabin lock the boat was observed for a while and left at which point it sank on the mooring overnight.

It turns out the owner thought insurance was a waste of money ( you agree to keep your boat insured Here )so I looked at a mast sticking out of the water till my boat was hauled at the end of october because they don't have the salvor money and it's not leaking fuel
 
Nov 24, 2010
92
Seafarer 26 Ruskin
Les and Gary I am with you. Good grief do a training exercise. At the very least they should have explained that they don't do property. But how did they know no one was inboard?
 
Nov 8, 2010
11,386
Beneteau First 36.7 & 260 Minneapolis MN & Bayfield WI
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. I know in Long Beach and San Diego, we have new cutters, a slug of new patrol craft and expanded staffing. That may not be the same for every area. Frankly, if their mission is changed so radically, we ought to just fold them into the USN and be done with them.

BTW, I have a lot of respect for the CG. Further, they are responsive and cooperative in my sailing area. Even if they offload property protection, they coordinate it and monitor it and I know they have responded at times.

But, there is simply no excuse for this behavior as described by Les. And, yes, I would expect Mexico, El Savador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Costa Rica and Columbia to assist if they could.
I agree with a lot of what your are saying. One other thought on the subject but not directed at you:

There is a widely held belief that you call the CG and someone presses a big red button and the boat pops right out. In fact there is a long protocol that looks at risk, situation, and available assets. Some pop thru the system faster than others.This one was a bit off the beaten track, bad weather, no known lives at risk, and no owner to pass to a fee-based property rescue service. I'm sure that took more time. And the person on the phone had NO idea how it would be handled.

The Coast Guard will tell you; expect a 1-2 hour response time. Its YOUR responsibility to be able to hang on that long. Plan for that, it might save your life some day.

My personal option was the station watchstanders were doing their job. If you wanna argue policy, call Washington. But the guys in the local office got better things to occupy their time than deal with emails that clearly involve set procedures set well above their pay grade.
 
Nov 24, 2010
92
Seafarer 26 Ruskin
K I understand your argument but isn't the it's not my job mentality the exact problem we are railing against.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.