Thanks, Joe. If I put in one of the plates from Rudy, I will have to cut the back off to raise and lower the mast off the stern. I seem to remember you had to do the same? By doing that, will I need to add a block to the mast to lead the boom vang aft? Or can I put that block on the plate along side the mast? It would seem that the geometry of a block on the side would harden the line when the boom swings to the opposite side and ease when going to the side where the block is mounted. Is my thinking flawed here?
Thanks again,
Mike
Mike,
Those are good questions that I really don't
have an answer to. Our boats are different and
our spars are probably different too, right? My
tabernacle and utility plate were made by Kenyon.
The one you're getting off Rudy is probably a
Dwyer Mfg. I don't think that it would look good
if you put a block between the mast and the
plate. I found out later that the block gave my
mast more clearance on the closed companionway
hatch which allowed it to be raised from a lower
position with the Gin Pole. It was later when I
built my Gin Pole that I discovered that the back
portion of the utility plate was preventing my
mast from sitting in the mast crotch on my stern
rail, after it was pinned in place at the
tabernacle. So I had my son cut the back of the
plate with a whizzer that he brought from home
one day. For the boom vang connection, you can
add some kind of a bale to the two back holes in
the utility plate. To this day I haven't gotten
around to doing that but if I think hard enough
without hurting myself, I can come up with a good
solution to that problem. I've been just tying
a small rope to the holes in the outside plate
for now, when I want to use my boom vang. If you have any pics of your old mast tabernacle and the surrounding deck that you can post here, I may be able to give you a better assessment of the situation.