The boat's being transported by truck. Why would or wouldn't you remove the main from an in-mast furler ? Seems to me that's the safest place for it to make the trip. It's all getting shrink wrapped anyway. Whats the difference ?
Halyards are tied to the cleats on the mast so it shouldn't matter. The rigger stands to make more money taking them down. That's why I'm asking. Every time there is something to do its a new added expence to the boat owner. The bill just keeps escalating.I would think shrink wrapping would protect every thing and sail be safe in mast,unless the riggers think different when taking the mast down and maybe when halyards are loose and no tension is not good for the sail inside the mast.
What are you being told to do,by the transporter and riggers.
Nick
Nope. The bottom is secure and the top is secure via the haylard pulling on it. I think it's actually better to have the sail in to protect the rod it is attached to. When the sail is out, that rod bangs around like there is no tomorrow. With the haylard pulled tight, it's not going anywhere.I would take the sail off. Here's why; the foil the sail rolls up on, inside the mast, is unsupported between the head and foot of the sail. With the mast upright the foil remains relatively and somewhat static and centered in the spar. Lay the mast down and the weight of the sail could have it resting on the internals of the spar. Now add road vibrations and bumps and you have a potential for chafing of the sail. Of course if it's going ten miles it's probably no big deal, but long distance I'd spend the ten minutes to remove it.
It takes about 10 minutes to remove the sail and fold it if the guys are competent..
Aux contrast, I would think the sail would had stiffness to the foil and the mast during transport. Less flopping around.I would take the sail off. Here's why; the foil the sail rolls up on, inside the mast, is unsupported between the head and foot of the sail. With the mast upright the foil remains relatively and somewhat static and centered in the spar. Lay the mast down and the weight of the sail will have it resting on the internals of the spar. Now add road vibrations and bumps and you have a real potential for chafe through of the sail. Of course if it's going ten miles it's probably no big deal, but long distance I'd spend the ten minutes to remove it.
It may but the sail adds bulk which is already in close proximity to the spar and this can potentially cause chafe while in the horizontal position.Aux contrast, I would think the sail would had stiffness to the foil and the mast during transport. Less flopping around.
You act as if I've never owned a main sail furling system just because I don't currently own one?So those with Roller furling say leave it in and those without say take it out. Who do you think knows the system better?
..Why would or wouldn't you remove the main from an in-mast furler ?
Franklin,Why not remove it? Because that pole that the sail is attached to is protected by the sail. Take the sail out and bounce that mast around and that might break. How much does that cost? That pole is made of aluminum and it will bounce like crazy if the sail isn't in it.
With the sail in and the haylard tight, NOTHING is going to move OR shafe at all, regardless of whether the mast is up or down.
It's not a matter how much time it takes to take the sail out, it's a matter of what is better for the mast.
What spar do you have where the halyard adjusts or changes tension or prevents movement of the foil? I was under the assumption, and I may be incorrect, that the 376 uses a Selden furling spar? If yours is a Selden I have yet to see one, but I'd like to, where the "bottom is secure and the top is secure via the halyard pulling on it".Nope. The bottom is secure and the top is secure via the haylard pulling on it. I think it's actually better to have the sail in to protect the rod it is attached to. When the sail is out, that rod bangs around like there is no tomorrow. With the haylard pulled tight, it's not going anywhere.