Foswick said:
I just want to chime in here with a small thing to add. When discussing the "best" treatment, it is probably worthwhile to distinguish between holding tanks that hold solid waste and those with only liquid. That is, poop or no poop. Chemically, they are quite different, obviously.
Actually they aren't..solid waste is 75% water--the same water that comes out of you separately as urine and dissolves very quickly in water. So when it comes to tank treatments, it doesn't matter whether the tank only holds flush water and urine or solid waste too. Nor does it matter whether the toilet uses sea water or fresh. So when it comes to tank treatments, it doesn't matter whether the tank only holds flush water and urine or solid waste too.
That seems counterintuitive. Urine itself is nearly sterile and, in fact discourages a lot of bacteria. Feces, on the other hand, comes with its own supply of bacteria. I have to believe that the best treatment for one is not optimal for the other.
Feces-holding tanks contain a mix of organic matter, including feces, toilet paper, and other waste. The bacterial composition in these tanks is more complex, involving both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria that break down organic matter. Treatments often focus on controlling odors, reducing solids, and maintaining bacterial balance. Enzymatic treatments and bio-active products that promote beneficial bacteria are commonly used.
Tanks primarily containing urine have a different chemical and bacterial profile. Urine is high in urea, which can convert to ammonia and cause strong odors. The bacterial content in urine-only tanks is usually less diverse, and the primary goal of treatment is often to control odors and prevent the formation of uric acid crystals. Acidic treatments can help prevent scaling and mineral buildup.
I do believe that one can find a treatment that works adequately for either, but not optimally. It is probably true that it isn't worth sweating the differences, but the differences do exist.