Old DataMarine instrument …does it speak NMEA0183?

Jan 7, 2011
5,319
Oday 322 East Chicago, IN
So I have an old Data marine speed log…

I am not using the display, but I would like to capture the STW data on my chart plotter and TacTic wireless wind display so I can get True wind speed.

My Garmin Cap will calculate true wind based on GPS speed over ground, but from what I read, Raymarine requires STW to calculate true wind…

So my question is, can I pull STW off the DataMarine transducer cable hooked into my NMEA 0183 data?

I have a Tac Tic T121 wireless interface that has 2 NMEA 0183 input connections. I am using this now to capture the wireless wind data and putting it out to my CP and AP.

I don’t really have any idea what sort of data this Data Marine put out….

IMG_1982.jpeg IMG_1981.jpeg


Any help or thoughts appreciated.


Greg
 
May 17, 2004
5,473
Beneteau Oceanis 37 Havre de Grace
Unlikely that you can do anything to get the data from the Datamarine. That transducer is probably just a dumb hash effect sensor or something like that. All of the “thinking” is probably done inside the display to translate the pulses from the paddle wheel into a speed.
 
  • Like
Likes: Ward H
Jan 7, 2011
5,319
Oday 322 East Chicago, IN
I get STW from my Datamarine instrument into my Raymarine CP for TWS.
How do you get the data from the DM device to your RM CP? That is exactly what I am trying to do…do you utilize NMEA0183 or some other protocol?

Greg
 
May 1, 2011
4,773
Pearson 37 Lusby MD
How do you get the data from the DM device to your RM CP? That is exactly what I am trying to do…do you utilize NMEA0183 or some other protocol?
I've got a converter of some sort installed in the pod for the wind instrument. I'll try to remember to check next time I'm at the boat.
 
  • Like
Likes: Tally Ho

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
The DM doesn't have an NMEA183 output. The only thing I can imagine is a microcontroller connected to the remote counter output, calculating STW periodically, and transmitting it to an NMEA183 port. Cool Arduino project. <- @Davidasailor26

[The remote counter output on the S100KL puts out a pulse every 0.1 mile (I'm assuming nautical mile). A simple program to time the duration between pulses and scale would give 'instantaneous' knots, then just format and transmit the NMEA183 sentence. I'm pretty sure you can get an off-the-shelf Arduino with the necessary interfaces built in, as NMEA183 uses RS-232 and/or RS-422 to drive, i.e., for talkers. Either interface will work with typical opto-isolated listeners.]
 
Last edited:

LloydB

.
Jan 15, 2006
905
Macgregor 22 Silverton
Required STW doesn't make sense because if you were adrift in a 4 knot current your speed through water would be 0 but the true wind could be 8 knots off depending upon which way it was blowing and the direction you are drifting. I think of true wind as being the speed and direction of the wind over the surface of the earth.
 
  • Like
Likes: heritage

jssailem

SBO Weather and Forecasting Forum Jim & John
Oct 22, 2014
22,389
CAL 35 Cruiser #21 moored EVERETT WA
You might try to examine the Raymarine ITC5. The unit fires the transducer, takes the transducer signal and will put it out onto SeatalkNG
 
  • Like
Likes: Ward H

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
Required STW doesn't make sense because if you were adrift in a 4 knot current your speed through water would be 0 but the true wind could be 8 knots off depending upon which way it was blowing and the direction you are drifting. I think of true wind as being the speed and direction of the wind over the surface of the earth.
It is true that it doesn't make complete sense, but that seems to be the way most "consumer" systems do it these days. A common definition is that:

"The True Wind is actually the sum of two other wind vectors:
  • The Ground Wind: is the wind that is measured relative to a fixed point on the ground (a weather station in the harbour, the instruments of a boat at anchor etc).
  • The Tide or Current Wind: is the wind created by the motion of the water relative to the land."
CURRENTS & TACTICS II – THE WIND TRIANGLE

I think it's just that the current wind is notoriously difficult to measure or otherwise determine in a way that integrates into instruments, or at least it seems so. Given that most currents people encounter are relatively slow, with the exception of rivers and the Gulf Stream, as a first level of approximation STW works. At least that's my analysis, FWIW.
 
May 17, 2004
5,473
Beneteau Oceanis 37 Havre de Grace
Using STW is the "proper" way for measuring TWS from a performance perspective. STW accounts for currents which is what you need to do if you want to track how you're trimmed and if you're hitting your performance targets.

Imagine (to use a simple example) your polars say that going dead downwind in 2 knots of wind you should go 1.5 knots. Now imagine you're pointed down river with a 2 knot current, and the ground wind speed is also 2 knots in the same direction as the current. Since there is no wind over the surface of the water the boat will just drift in the 2 knot current, showing STW of 0, SOG of 2, and apparent wind of 0. If you're using SOG for the TWS calculation your instruments will say that since you're going 2 knots with 0 apparent wind the TWS must be 2. So you look at your polars for 2 knots downwind and assume you should be going 1.5 knots. Then you look at your STW of 0 and SOG of 2 and think neither of those match the polars, so something must be wrong and in need of tuning.

That's a contrived example and you could probably figure out on the water what's happening and how to compensate, but it demonstrates the type of confusion you can cause using SOG/GWS for performance monitoring. If you use STW/TWS you're always getting good performance measurements for the boat.
 
  • Helpful
Likes: Ward H

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
it demonstrates the type of confusion you can cause using SOG/GWS for performance monitoring. If you use STW/TWS you're always getting good performance measurements for the boat.
Did you mean SOG/GWS, or perhaps SOG/TWS? If so, what's GWS?

It is, indeed, confusing. But then, the polars can't always be correct. For equal and opposite wind of the ground and current wind, the TWS will always be zero, regardless of the magnitude of the wind. So, You might be going 2, 3, 4 kt., with zero TWS, and the polars can't explain that. Isn't that so?
 
May 17, 2004
5,473
Beneteau Oceanis 37 Havre de Grace
Did you mean SOG/GWS, or perhaps SOG/TWS? If so, what's GWS?

It is, indeed, confusing. But then, the polars can't always be correct. For equal and opposite wind of the ground and current wind, the TWS will always be zero, regardless of the magnitude of the wind. So, You might be going 2, 3, 4 kt., with zero TWS, and the polars can't explain that. Isn't that so?
GWS is Ground Wind Speed - the actual speed of the wind over the unmoving ground, as opposed to TWS as the speed of the wind over the surface of the water.

The polars will always be correct (assuming you sail to your polars) if you’re measuring boat speed through the water and true wind speed relative to the surface of the water. If you have zero TWS that means you have no wind over the surface of the water, and your boat will not be moving (relative to the surface of the water). The boat will be moving with the current (speed over ground), but from the standpoint of measuring boat performance you don’t care about that - it’s not actionable for tuning or trimming the boat.
 

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
GWS is Ground Wind Speed - the actual speed of the wind over the unmoving ground, as opposed to TWS as the speed of the wind over the surface of the water.

The polars will always be correct (assuming you sail to your polars) if you’re measuring boat speed through the water and true wind speed relative to the surface of the water. If you have zero TWS that means you have no wind over the surface of the water, and your boat will not be moving (relative to the surface of the water). The boat will be moving with the current (speed over ground), but from the standpoint of measuring boat performance you don’t care about that - it’s not actionable for tuning or trimming the boat.
Ah, I see. It depends on how you define TWS. The definition I'm familiar with isn't the same as yours. You're saying wind speed relative to the water's surface. I subscribe to the definition that TWS is the vector sum of wind over the ground and current wind (I quoted this in a previous reply):

"The True Wind is actually the sum of two other wind vectors:
  • The Ground Wind: is the wind that is measured relative to a fixed point on the ground (a weather station in the harbour, the instruments of a boat at anchor etc).
  • The Tide or Current Wind: is the wind created by the motion of the water relative to the land."
CURRENTS & TACTICS II – THE WIND TRIANGLE
 
May 17, 2004
5,473
Beneteau Oceanis 37 Havre de Grace
Ah, I see. It depends on how you define TWS. The definition I'm familiar with isn't the same as yours. You're saying wind speed relative to the water's surface. I subscribe to the definition that TWS is the vector sum of wind over the ground and current wind (I quoted this in a previous reply):

"The True Wind is actually the sum of two other wind vectors:
  • The Ground Wind: is the wind that is measured relative to a fixed point on the ground (a weather station in the harbour, the instruments of a boat at anchor etc).
  • The Tide or Current Wind: is the wind created by the motion of the water relative to the land."
CURRENTS & TACTICS II – THE WIND TRIANGLE
I think that is my definition of TWS. The first bullet is what I’ve seen called GWS. When you add in the current you’re measuring wind speed relative to the surface of the water.
 
  • Like
Likes: jviss

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
I think that is my definition of TWS. The first bullet is what I’ve seen called GWS. When you add in the current you’re measuring wind speed relative to the surface of the water.
Hmmm, I'll have to think about that. :)
 

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
The DM doesn't have an NMEA183 output. The only thing I can imagine is a microcontroller connected to the remote counter output, calculating STW periodically, and transmitting it to an NMEA183 port. Cool Arduino project. <- @Davidasailor26

[The remote counter output on the S100KL puts out a pulse every 0.1 mile (I'm assuming nautical mile). A simple program to time the duration between pulses and scale would give 'instantaneous' knots, then just format and transmit the NMEA183 sentence. I'm pretty sure you can get an off-the-shelf Arduino with the necessary interfaces built in, as NMEA183 uses RS-232 and/or RS-422 to drive, i.e., for talkers. Either interface will work with typical opto-isolated listeners.]
Updating my post on an Arduino adapter for this. The 0.1 mile pulse is going to result in a very slow update rate, like once per minute at 6 knots, once every 6 minutes at 1 knot, and so forth. Not very useful. I was thinking, with the schematic of the S100KL it's probably possible to tap the pulses from the transducer, which should be much, much more frequent! This would require an "invasive" adapter, but I'm sure it's possible.
 
Last edited: