Why are all the news outlets reporting that "both his masts were broken" with an accompanying picture of a sloop with what appears to be an intact mast?
Because they really don't care if they get it right. Or wrong, it seems.Why are all the news outlets reporting that "both his masts were broken" with an accompanying picture of a sloop with what appears to be an intact mast?
By the way: "malia"? What do you mean by that?
That doesn't seem to help, Mr. Jackson.
Yep, boat name. I probably should have included a link to one of the news stories. (And I use the word story literally...) I'd just heard Brian Williams repeat the "both masts broken" thing on TV when I posted that.Ah, it's the name of the boat. Never mind.
I couldn't find the boat's name in Stu's link to the other thread, and neither in the news, so I just figured...Yep, boat name. I probably should have included a link to one of the news stories. (And I use the word story literally...) I'd just heard Brian Williams repeat the "both masts broken" thing on TV when I posted that.
This version sounds a little more believable: http://www.uscgnews.com/go/doc/4007/2434001/
Piece of cake. That's the US Coast Guard cutter(?) 723.Now it's time to play the "ID that boat" game...
Almost definitely a Bayfield 25.What was the make of the boat?