The difference
between a storm surge and a tsunami is, I suspect, substantial. A storm surge is just wind-driven water on top of the normal tide that raises water level in the affcetd region for a period of time. Like a flood on a river, it crests, then subsides as the water drains back to the sea and the wind dies down. It has neither wave length nor forward velocity though it does have amplitude. A tsunami, though, is an energy-carrying wave with a wave length of many miles, a speed approaching 500 MPH, and a tiny amplitude when at sea. As it shoals, its amplitude increases, its speed decreases and all that energy becvcomes concentrated in a small region. It doesn't just rise and flood the land. It smashes into the land and carries all before it. The continental shelf might well put the brakes on a tsunami aimed at the US East Coast, but do you really want to see the bottom suddenly appear all the way to the 100 fathom line, then have the sea rush back in?
between a storm surge and a tsunami is, I suspect, substantial. A storm surge is just wind-driven water on top of the normal tide that raises water level in the affcetd region for a period of time. Like a flood on a river, it crests, then subsides as the water drains back to the sea and the wind dies down. It has neither wave length nor forward velocity though it does have amplitude. A tsunami, though, is an energy-carrying wave with a wave length of many miles, a speed approaching 500 MPH, and a tiny amplitude when at sea. As it shoals, its amplitude increases, its speed decreases and all that energy becvcomes concentrated in a small region. It doesn't just rise and flood the land. It smashes into the land and carries all before it. The continental shelf might well put the brakes on a tsunami aimed at the US East Coast, but do you really want to see the bottom suddenly appear all the way to the 100 fathom line, then have the sea rush back in?